<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog</provider_name><provider_url>https://beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog</provider_url><author_name>Beyond Pesticides</author_name><author_url>https://beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/author/beyond-pesticides/</author_url><title>Researchers Looking For Alternatives to DEET - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="KAAgwai4f6"&gt;&lt;a href="https://beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/2008/05/researchers-looking-for-alternatives-to-deet/"&gt;Researchers Looking For Alternatives to DEET&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/2008/05/researchers-looking-for-alternatives-to-deet/embed/#?secret=KAAgwai4f6" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Researchers Looking For Alternatives to DEET&#x201D; &#x2014; Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog" data-secret="KAAgwai4f6" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>(Beyond Pesticides, May 28, 2008) Researchers have begun preliminary work to find suitable and safe alternatives to the widely used mosquito repellent DEET. Several possibilities have been identified, which repel mosquitoes for longer periods of time, but their safety for use on humans still needs to be investigated.Researchers, with funding from the Department of Defense, set out to determine what makes insect repellents work, and then to use that information in finding more effective ways to chase away disease-carrying insects. Insect repellents are used to repel biting insects such as mosquitoes and ticks that spread diseases such as encephalitis, Lyme disease, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, malaria and dengue fever. Ulrich R. Bernier, PhD, co-author of this study published online in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences http://www.pnas.org/ and research chemist at the Agriculture Department&#x2019;s mosquito and fly research unit in Gainesville, Fla., remarked that several of the new chemicals reviewed were &#x201C;just phenomenal.&#x201D; Using previous USDA data on hundreds of chemicals collected over 50 years, the researchers rated chemicals from &#x201C;1&#x201D; to &#x201C;5&#x201D; on ability to repel insects, and then focused on what the most effective ones &#x201D;&#x201D; the 5s &#x201D;&#x201D; had in common. They were able to [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
