<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog</provider_name><provider_url>https://beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog</provider_url><author_name>Beyond Pesticides</author_name><author_url>https://beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/author/beyond-pesticides/</author_url><title>The Ever-Revolving Door: Industry and the EPA - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="biiQJLfrGp"&gt;&lt;a href="https://beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/2017/10/ever-revolving-door-industry-epa/"&gt;The Ever-Revolving Door: Industry and the EPA&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/2017/10/ever-revolving-door-industry-epa/embed/#?secret=biiQJLfrGp" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;The Ever-Revolving Door: Industry and the EPA&#x201D; &#x2014; Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog" data-secret="biiQJLfrGp" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>(Beyond Pesticides, October 3, 2017)&#xA0;On August 20, the U.S. Senate was to have held a hearing on the Trump Administration&#x2019;s nominee for Environmental Protection Agency Assistant Administrator for chemical safety, Michael L. Dourson, PhD. The hearing was abruptly postponed on August 19, with no reason offered, and has not yet been rescheduled. Dr. Dourson has spent a good deal of his career helping companies resist constraints on their use of potentially toxic compounds in consumer products. Critics, including former EPA officials, Congressional Democrats, and public health scientists say that these ties with the chemical industry, in particular, should keep him from becoming the country&#x2019;s chief regulator of toxic chemicals. U.S. Senator Tom Carper (D-DE) said, &#x201C;Dr. Dourson&#x2019;s consistent endorsement of chemical safety standards that not only match industry&#x2019;s views, but are also significantly less protective than EPA and other regulators have recommended, raises serious doubts about his ability to lead those efforts. This is the first time anyone with such clear and extensive ties to the chemical industry has been [nominated] to regulate that industry.&#x201D; Dr. Dourson is perhaps the most recent example of the &#x201C;revolving door&#x201D; phenomenon &#x2014; the movement of people between roles as agency regulators or legislators, [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
