{"id":22577,"date":"2018-05-08T00:00:37","date_gmt":"2018-05-08T04:00:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/?p=22577"},"modified":"2018-05-08T01:17:22","modified_gmt":"2018-05-08T05:17:22","slug":"pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/","title":{"rendered":"Pesticide Safety Data Transparency a Blind Spot under EPA Policy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-22587\" src=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/images-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"275\" height=\"183\" \/>(<em>Beyond Pesticides<\/em>, May 8, 2018)\u00a0U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt\u2019s controversial <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gpo.gov\/fdsys\/pkg\/FR-2018-04-30\/pdf\/2018-09078.pdf?eType=EmailBlastContent&amp;eId=d5c5b64d-5094-4638-aaba-d7fdf9fa8521\">plan for disclosing the underlying data<\/a> supporting its regulatory science has a big blind spot \u2013pesticides. \u00a0An analysis released today by Beyond Pesticides and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) points out that under Pruitt\u2019s plan the public will still lack access to key data about the effects and efficacy of commercial poisons approved for sale and application in their communities and homes.<\/p>\n<p>The proposed policy posted on April 30 in the Federal Register declares that it will \u201chelp ensure that EPA is pursuing its mission of public health and the environment in a manner that the public can trust and understand&#8221; yet it only applies to a very limited set of studies used to support certain EPA regulations.<\/p>\n<p>It does not cover pesticide registrations, warning labels, use restrictions, or proof of effectiveness. \u00a0In the current process, the pesticide manufacturer produces the underlying data for these EPA approvals and controls access to it. \u00a0Thus, despite Pruitt\u2019s sweeping claims of \u201ctransparency in regulatory science\u201d \u2013<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The public does not have access to the underlying data provided by the manufacturer to justify registering a new pesticide for commercial distribution;<\/li>\n<li>Industry will not have to provide the data used to assess health and environmental effects and farmworker impacts to set allowable dietary and non-dietary exposure limits; and<\/li>\n<li>On the product\u2019s efficacy, the public also does not have access to the underlying data nor does EPA even review manufacturer data on product effectiveness, except for very limited purposes.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>\u201cTo ensure full review, it is critical that the public and independent scientific community have complete access to safety testing data before poisonous pesticide products enter the marketplace,\u201d said J. Routt Reigart, M.D., president of Beyond Pesticides. \u201cFurthermore, the failure to label all ingredients in pesticide products used by the public runs contrary to the basic principle of informed decision making.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In some pesticide decisions, such as conditional registrations, EPA grants new registrations and product labels without full information based on an agreement the manufacturer provides the data at a later date. \u00a0Pruitt\u2019s plan does not require industry to present its data up front or to make that data publicly available.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPruitt\u2019s plan does not enable the public to have any meaningful information about \u2018environmental health risk or safety risk\u2019 as he claims,\u201d stated PEER General Counsel Paula Dinerstein. \u201cUnder a false flag of scientific transparency, Pruitt\u2019s scheme hobbles scientific work used to protect the public but shields industry data that may demonstrate the public health peril.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Secret Science in EPA Pesticide Regulation\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Access to data on pesticides is critical to protection of health and the environment EPA has proposed a rulemaking that purports to make science used in EPA regulatory decision making transparent and available to the public.\u00a0 However, the proposal by its terms applies only to significant EPA rulemakings where EPA is seeking to protect public health and the environment, but not to matters such as pesticide registrations, where private companies are seeking authorization to market products that may be harmful to public health and the environment.\u00a0 The pesticide registration and review processes are particularly lacking in transparency and opportunity for public review and access to data.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Data used to approve pesticides not available to the public<\/strong><br \/>\nPesticides are registered (authorized for use) based on studies and data submitted by the manufacturer (registrant), not based on science conducted or commissioned by EPA.\u00a0 This registrant data is not available for public review until after the pesticide is registered.\u00a0 The nonpublic data submitted by the registrant is used by EPA to assess health and environmental effects of the pesticide, impacts on farmworkers, and to set allowable human exposures through dietary and non-dietary routes \u2013 all without any opportunity for public review of the underlying data.<\/p>\n<p>After registration, the public can access the materials upon which the registration was granted (which still may not include all underlying data) only through making requests under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), a lengthy process.\u00a0 Even then, much information is withheld as purportedly \u201cconfidential.\u201d\u00a0 If problems are identified that uncover a hazard from the pesticide, a member of the public would need to petition for a proceeding to cancel the registration, a much longer and unwieldy process during which the pesticide remains on the market.<\/p>\n<p>EPA\u2019s registration, registration review and cancellation of pesticides raise numerous issues regarding the application of legitimate scientific process, risk assessment, exposure assumptions, sensitive populations, and the \u201creasonableness\u201d of what are found to be \u201cacceptable\u201d hazards. Transparency of agency processes and underlying data is key to allowing public participation concerning these issues.\u00a0\u00a0 Full disclosure of known and unknown adverse effects needed\u00a0 EPA does not currently require that registrants disclose data submitted to EPA or placed on pesticide labels (including household pesticides) concerning the full extent of knowledge and\/or ignorance of possible adverse effects, including data gaps and chronic health effects. Registrants\u2019 exposure and toxicology studies are not released to the public so that any interested stakeholder can review them prior to a product being permitted on the market.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Conditional registration missing crucial data<\/strong><br \/>\nPesticide registrations under special circumstances, also known as \u201cconditional registration,\u201d allow widespread use of toxic chemicals that are not fully tested. Conditional registration of pesticides allows market entry for a product in the absence of certain data normally required for registration. As one glaring example, the agency came under scrutiny when it conditionally registered the neonicotinoid pesticide, chlothianidin, tied to dramatic declines in pollinators, without pertinent field data required on honeybees, even though the pesticide is known to pose risks to these vulnerable pollinators.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Efficacy data on pesticide products<\/strong><br \/>\nThe public does not have access to, and EPA does not review, manufacturer data on pesticide efficacy, even though the statutory registration standard requires weighing the risks of pesticides against their benefits.\u00a0 Without efficacy information, the real benefits of a pesticide are unknown, and the reasonableness of pesticide use cannot be assessed. The lack of efficacy data review results in escalating and predictable insect and weed resistance, unnecessarily increases in pesticide use, and putting farmers at risk of crop loss and economic damage.\u00a0\u00a0 The only instance in which EPA evaluates pesticide efficacy is as a part of public health (not agricultural) pesticide registrations, and even this is without public disclosure or opportunity for comment.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u201cSecret ingredients\u201d in pesticide products not disclosed<\/strong><br \/>\nCurrently, pesticide labels do not identify \u201cinert\u201d ingredients that have been classified as hazardous under a variety of environmental laws, including the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act. Disclosure would provide information about almost 400 hazardous chemicals in pesticide products.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Only active ingredients, not formulations tested<\/strong><br \/>\nEPA does not require testing data on the full formulation of a pesticide product, including all of the inert ingredients.\u00a0 Thus, data on the human health and environmental effects of the actual product on the market is entirely lacking.<\/p>\n<p>The federal government needs a vision for pesticide policy across relevant agencies that seeks to replace outdated approaches and technologies reliant on toxic chemicals with green approaches advanced through incentives, assistance and restrictions. This cannot be achieved without full transparency and disclosure of toxic hazards of pesticide products in the marketplace. Without full information on pesticide hazards, access to underlying data on hazards, and a transparent assessment of the reasonableness of risk given the availability of less or non-toxic alternatives, the public is left in the dark. Credible reviews, subject to public oversight, are essential in EPA\u2019s regulation of pesticides to prevent contamination of air, land, water, and food.<\/p>\n<p><em>All unattributed positions and opinions in this piece are those of Beyond Pesticides.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Sources: Paula Dinerstein [PEER] (202) 265-7337; Jay Feldman [Beyond Pesticides] (202) 543-5450<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/default.salsalabs.org\/T47d17f33-395b-4b8b-87ff-2b6ebf532dc8\/83d147b3-a79b-11e7-872c-0adaa6058903\">View the proposed rule<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Beyond Pesticides, May 8, 2018)\u00a0U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt\u2019s controversial plan for disclosing the underlying data supporting its regulatory science has a big blind spot \u2013pesticides. \u00a0An analysis released today by Beyond Pesticides and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) points out that under Pruitt\u2019s plan the public will still lack access to key data about the effects and efficacy of commercial poisons approved for sale and application in their communities and homes. The proposed policy posted on April 30 in the Federal Register declares that it will \u201chelp ensure that EPA is pursuing its mission of public health and the environment in a manner that the public can trust and understand&#8221; yet it only applies to a very limited set of studies used to support certain EPA regulations. It does not cover pesticide registrations, warning labels, use restrictions, or proof of effectiveness. \u00a0In the current process, the pesticide manufacturer produces the underlying data for these EPA approvals and controls access to it. \u00a0Thus, despite Pruitt\u2019s sweeping claims of \u201ctransparency in regulatory science\u201d \u2013 The public does not have access to the underlying data provided by the manufacturer to justify registering a new pesticide for commercial distribution; Industry [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[354,10,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22577","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-environmental-protection-agency-epa","category-pesticide-regulation","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Pesticide Safety Data Transparency a Blind Spot under EPA Policy - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pesticide Safety Data Transparency a Blind Spot under EPA Policy - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"(Beyond Pesticides, May 8, 2018)\u00a0U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt\u2019s controversial plan for disclosing the underlying data supporting its regulatory science has a big blind spot \u2013pesticides. \u00a0An analysis released today by Beyond Pesticides and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) points out that under Pruitt\u2019s plan the public will still lack access to key data about the effects and efficacy of commercial poisons approved for sale and application in their communities and homes. The proposed policy posted on April 30 in the Federal Register declares that it will \u201chelp ensure that EPA is pursuing its mission of public health and the environment in a manner that the public can trust and understand&#8221; yet it only applies to a very limited set of studies used to support certain EPA regulations. It does not cover pesticide registrations, warning labels, use restrictions, or proof of effectiveness. \u00a0In the current process, the pesticide manufacturer produces the underlying data for these EPA approvals and controls access to it. \u00a0Thus, despite Pruitt\u2019s sweeping claims of \u201ctransparency in regulatory science\u201d \u2013 The public does not have access to the underlying data provided by the manufacturer to justify registering a new pesticide for commercial distribution; Industry [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-05-08T04:00:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-05-08T05:17:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/images-2.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Beyond Pesticides\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ByondPesticides\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ByondPesticides\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Beyond Pesticides\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Beyond Pesticides\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5c0a0981b549cc5b628770073031f4\"},\"headline\":\"Pesticide Safety Data Transparency a Blind Spot under EPA Policy\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-05-08T04:00:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-08T05:17:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/\"},\"wordCount\":1308,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/images-2.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)\",\"Pesticide Regulation\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/\",\"name\":\"Pesticide Safety Data Transparency a Blind Spot under EPA Policy - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/images-2.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-05-08T04:00:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-08T05:17:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/images-2.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/images-2.jpg\",\"width\":275,\"height\":183},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pesticide Safety Data Transparency a Blind Spot under EPA Policy\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/\",\"name\":\"Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog\",\"description\":\"News on Pesticide Science, Policy and Activism\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Beyond Pesticides\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/BeyondPesticides-Logo-Stacked-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/BeyondPesticides-Logo-Stacked-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":2501,\"caption\":\"Beyond Pesticides\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/ByondPesticides\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/beyondpesticides\/?hl=en\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/beyond-pesticides\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/bpncamp\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5c0a0981b549cc5b628770073031f4\",\"name\":\"Beyond Pesticides\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e26b7558fcb265e244c6e159abe5f0aab551822dc82fd0b1607e809bdfbed20a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e26b7558fcb265e244c6e159abe5f0aab551822dc82fd0b1607e809bdfbed20a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Beyond Pesticides\"},\"description\":\"Beyond Pesticides is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C., which works with allies in protecting public health and the environment to lead the transition to a world free of toxic pesticides. The founders, who established Beyond Pesticides (originally as National Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides) as a nonprofit membership organization in 1981, felt that without the existence of such an organized, national network, local, state and national pesticide policy would become, under chemical industry pressure, increasingly unresponsive to public health and environmental concerns. Beyond Pesticides believes that people must have a voice in decisions that affect them directly. We believe decisions should not be made for us by chemical companies or by decision-makers who either do not have all of the facts or refuse to consider them. Learn more about our work, read A Year in Review\u20142021, our accomplishments are your victories! Beyond Pesticides seeks to protect healthy air, water, land, and food for ourselves and future generations. By forging ties with governments, nonprofits, and people who rely on these natural resources, we reduce the need for unnecessary pesticide use and protect public health and the environment. Beyond Pesticides provides hands-on services to the public and supports local action by: identifying and interpreting hazards; and, designing safe pest management programs. With the information provided by Beyond Pesticides, people may not only be able to make informed choices and adopt practices that protect themselves and their families from unnecessary exposure to pesticides, but they will be able to effect changes on community-wide pest management decisions and policies that govern pesticide use, such as pesticide uses in parks, schools, for community insect control and along roadsides. Beyond Pesticides believes that people must have a voice in decisions which affect them directly.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\/\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/beyondpesticides\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/beyond-pesticides\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/ByondPesticides\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/bpncamp\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/author\/beyond-pesticides\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pesticide Safety Data Transparency a Blind Spot under EPA Policy - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pesticide Safety Data Transparency a Blind Spot under EPA Policy - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","og_description":"(Beyond Pesticides, May 8, 2018)\u00a0U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt\u2019s controversial plan for disclosing the underlying data supporting its regulatory science has a big blind spot \u2013pesticides. \u00a0An analysis released today by Beyond Pesticides and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) points out that under Pruitt\u2019s plan the public will still lack access to key data about the effects and efficacy of commercial poisons approved for sale and application in their communities and homes. The proposed policy posted on April 30 in the Federal Register declares that it will \u201chelp ensure that EPA is pursuing its mission of public health and the environment in a manner that the public can trust and understand&#8221; yet it only applies to a very limited set of studies used to support certain EPA regulations. It does not cover pesticide registrations, warning labels, use restrictions, or proof of effectiveness. \u00a0In the current process, the pesticide manufacturer produces the underlying data for these EPA approvals and controls access to it. \u00a0Thus, despite Pruitt\u2019s sweeping claims of \u201ctransparency in regulatory science\u201d \u2013 The public does not have access to the underlying data provided by the manufacturer to justify registering a new pesticide for commercial distribution; Industry [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/","og_site_name":"Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\/","article_published_time":"2018-05-08T04:00:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-05-08T05:17:22+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/images-2.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Beyond Pesticides","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ByondPesticides","twitter_site":"@ByondPesticides","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Beyond Pesticides","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/"},"author":{"name":"Beyond Pesticides","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5c0a0981b549cc5b628770073031f4"},"headline":"Pesticide Safety Data Transparency a Blind Spot under EPA Policy","datePublished":"2018-05-08T04:00:37+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-08T05:17:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/"},"wordCount":1308,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/images-2.jpg","articleSection":["Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)","Pesticide Regulation"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/","name":"Pesticide Safety Data Transparency a Blind Spot under EPA Policy - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/images-2.jpg","datePublished":"2018-05-08T04:00:37+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-08T05:17:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/images-2.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/images-2.jpg","width":275,"height":183},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/05\/pesticide-safety-data-transparency-blind-spot-epa-policy\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pesticide Safety Data Transparency a Blind Spot under EPA Policy"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/","name":"Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","description":"News on Pesticide Science, Policy and Activism","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization","name":"Beyond Pesticides","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/BeyondPesticides-Logo-Stacked-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/BeyondPesticides-Logo-Stacked-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":2501,"caption":"Beyond Pesticides"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides","https:\/\/x.com\/ByondPesticides","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/beyondpesticides\/?hl=en","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/beyond-pesticides","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/bpncamp"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5c0a0981b549cc5b628770073031f4","name":"Beyond Pesticides","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e26b7558fcb265e244c6e159abe5f0aab551822dc82fd0b1607e809bdfbed20a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e26b7558fcb265e244c6e159abe5f0aab551822dc82fd0b1607e809bdfbed20a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Beyond Pesticides"},"description":"Beyond Pesticides is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C., which works with allies in protecting public health and the environment to lead the transition to a world free of toxic pesticides. The founders, who established Beyond Pesticides (originally as National Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides) as a nonprofit membership organization in 1981, felt that without the existence of such an organized, national network, local, state and national pesticide policy would become, under chemical industry pressure, increasingly unresponsive to public health and environmental concerns. Beyond Pesticides believes that people must have a voice in decisions that affect them directly. We believe decisions should not be made for us by chemical companies or by decision-makers who either do not have all of the facts or refuse to consider them. Learn more about our work, read A Year in Review\u20142021, our accomplishments are your victories! Beyond Pesticides seeks to protect healthy air, water, land, and food for ourselves and future generations. By forging ties with governments, nonprofits, and people who rely on these natural resources, we reduce the need for unnecessary pesticide use and protect public health and the environment. Beyond Pesticides provides hands-on services to the public and supports local action by: identifying and interpreting hazards; and, designing safe pest management programs. With the information provided by Beyond Pesticides, people may not only be able to make informed choices and adopt practices that protect themselves and their families from unnecessary exposure to pesticides, but they will be able to effect changes on community-wide pest management decisions and policies that govern pesticide use, such as pesticide uses in parks, schools, for community insect control and along roadsides. Beyond Pesticides believes that people must have a voice in decisions which affect them directly.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/beyondpesticides\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/beyond-pesticides\/","https:\/\/x.com\/ByondPesticides","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/bpncamp\/"],"url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/author\/beyond-pesticides\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22577","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22577"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22577\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22591,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22577\/revisions\/22591"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22577"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22577"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22577"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}