{"id":28167,"date":"2020-11-04T00:01:35","date_gmt":"2020-11-04T04:01:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/?p=28167"},"modified":"2020-11-04T11:38:57","modified_gmt":"2020-11-04T15:38:57","slug":"after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/","title":{"rendered":"After Court Rules Herbicide &#8220;Would Tear the Social Fabric of Farming Communities,&#8221; Dicamba in Genetically Engineered Crops Given Go-Ahead by EPA"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>(<em>Beyond Pesticides<\/em>, November 4, 2020) Despite <a href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/06\/federal-court-halts-use-of-drift-prone-dicamba-on-millions-of-acres-of-ge-soy-and-cotton\/\">a recent court ruling<\/a> voiding the registration of drift-prone dicamba herbicides on genetically engineered (GE) cotton and soybeans, EPA has renewed\u00a0 the registration of these chemicals. The court\u2019s ruling stated that EPA, \u201csubstantially understated risks that it acknowledged and failed entirely to acknowledge other risks,\u201d in regards to the herbicides XtendiMax and Eugenia (dicamba), produced by agrichemical corporations Bayer and BASF for their genetically engineered (GE) crops. In announcing the decision, Administrator Andrew Wheeler said the agency made its decision \u201c[a]fter reviewing substantial amounts of new information, conducting scientific assessments based on the best available science, and carefully considering input from stakeholders.\u201d Yet, it is evident that the most important stakeholders for EPA continues to be chemical corporations.<\/p>\n<p>The history of dicamba\u2019s use in GE agriculture reveal this to be the case. In the mid-2010s, Bayer\u2019s Monsanto <a href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/category\/chemicals\/dicamba\/page\/2\/\">developed new dicamba-tolerant seeds<\/a> and received approval to sell them from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. EPA had not yet approved its corresponding herbicide, but nonetheless, Bayer\u2019s Monsanto <a href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/category\/chemicals\/dicamba\/page\/2\/\">urged farmers to plant its seed<\/a>, claiming they would increase yields. The results of this were predictable: <a href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2016\/10\/epa-investigates-dicamba-misuse-missouri\/\">farmers began to use older, unapproved dicamba formulations on their new GE seeds<\/a>, and reports of drift damage began to spring up throughout the US. \u00a0Dicamba has a strong propensity to drift off-site and can defoliate other crops at very low levels. Rather than take regulatory action to stop illegal use, EPA and USDA sat on their hands while the chemicals pitted <a href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/02\/farmer-sues-bayer-monsanto-for-crop-damage-caused-by-the-insecticide-dicamba\/\">farmer against farmer<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2017\/06\/14\/532879755\/a-pesticide-a-pigweed-and-a-farmers-murder\">neighbor against neighbor<\/a>, in communities throughout the U.S.<\/p>\n<p>In 2016, <a href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2016\/11\/epa-registers-dicamba-ge-crops-adding-growing-herbicide-resistance-issue\/\">EPA approved<\/a> agrichemical companies\u2019 new \u201clow volatility\u201d dicamba herbicide formulations under a two year conditional registration. But by the end of 2017, according to court records and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/us-usa-pesticides-epa-exclusive\/exclusive-epa-eyes-limits-for-agricultural-chemical-linked-to-crop-damage-idUSKCN1BG1GT\">reporting from Reuters<\/a>, state agriculture departments, primarily in the US Midwest, had been called for over 2,600 incident reports, and scientists indicated over 3.6 million acres of non-GE soybean crops had been damaged by dicamba drift \u2013 likely an underestimate according to EPA\u2019s own staff.<\/p>\n<p>EPA tried to tweak the label of the herbicide to lessen the impact, while Bayer persisted in blaming farmers for using older dicamba formulations. The <a href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2018\/08\/emails-show-epa-let-monsanto-write-rules-toxic-drift-prone-herbicide\/\">agency let Bayer write it\u2019s own rules on drift procedures<\/a>, undermining the independent scientist who worked closely with the company at the last second. This led to the agency <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20190414013146\/https:\/www.epa.gov\/newsreleases\/epa-announces-changes-dicamba-registration\">reapproving the highly drift-prone herbicide<\/a> for another two year stint.<\/p>\n<p>Advocates sued. The case worked its way through the courts, eventually resulting in a rare rebuke of EPA under the nation\u2019s federal pesticide law, the Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). <a href=\"https:\/\/www.centerforfoodsafety.org\/files\/125--dicamba-opinion_35970.pdf\">The written court ruling<\/a> by the U.S. Ninth Circuit noted how EPA made its label language so difficult to understand as to make it \u201cdifficult if not impossible to follow for even conscientious users.\u201d The agency also failed to consider the \u201canti-competitive economic effects\u201d on non-GE markets \u2013 a knock against the agency\u2019s propensity to favor chemical industry executives. And perhaps most egregiously, the judge ruled that EPA failed to account for how \u201cdicamba use would tear the social fabric of farming communities.\u201d The evidence was there, yet EPA sided with moneyed interests over the well-being of average Americans in farming communities.<\/p>\n<p>Now, EPA is not only ignoring its statutory duties, but rejecting them and helping to perpetuate the chemical industry\u2019s bad behavior. Its reapproved dicamba formulations come with i) new \u201cimportant control measures\u201d requiring a buffering agent (of questionably efficacy) be used; ii) a larger buffer (one roughly the size recommended by the independent scientists EPA allowed Bayer to overrule); iii) restrictions that prohibit use after July 30 (meaningless since that is roughly the end of the growing season) and; iv) an amorphous commitment to \u201csimplifying the label and use directions\u201d of dicamba products. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cEPA believes that these new analyses address the concerns expressed in regard to EPA\u2019s 2018 dicamba registrations in the June 2020 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth\u00a0Circuit,\u201d the agency\u2019s press release states. \u00a0Health and environmental advocates <a href=\"https:\/\/biologicaldiversity.org\/w\/news\/press-releases\/epa-reapproves-dangerous-drift-prone-dicamba-pesticides-recently-banned-federal-court-causing-widespread-economic-harm-farmers-2020-10-27\/\">have already announced they will go back to court to challenge the decision.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Reworking EPA into an effective agency that lives up to its namesake will take time, effort, and significant involvement by all Americans. It is critically important to put pressure on elected officials hold government agencies accountable to the people, not the profits and compensation packages of agrichemical industry executives. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org\/join\/sign-me-up\">Join Beyond Pesticides<\/a> and help us fight for a more just regulatory system. For more information on the hazards of dicamba and GE agriculture, see <a href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/programs\/genetic-engineering\/herbicide-tolerance\">Beyond Pesticides webpage.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>All unattributed positions and opinions in this piece are those of Beyond Pesticides.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/newsreleases\/epa-announces-2020-dicamba-registration-decision\">EPA<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Beyond Pesticides, November 4, 2020) Despite a recent court ruling voiding the registration of drift-prone dicamba herbicides on genetically engineered (GE) cotton and soybeans, EPA has renewed\u00a0 the registration of these chemicals. The court\u2019s ruling stated that EPA, \u201csubstantially understated risks that it acknowledged and failed entirely to acknowledge other risks,\u201d in regards to the herbicides XtendiMax and Eugenia (dicamba), produced by agrichemical corporations Bayer and BASF for their genetically engineered (GE) crops. In announcing the decision, Administrator Andrew Wheeler said the agency made its decision \u201c[a]fter reviewing substantial amounts of new information, conducting scientific assessments based on the best available science, and carefully considering input from stakeholders.\u201d Yet, it is evident that the most important stakeholders for EPA continues to be chemical corporations. The history of dicamba\u2019s use in GE agriculture reveal this to be the case. In the mid-2010s, Bayer\u2019s Monsanto developed new dicamba-tolerant seeds and received approval to sell them from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. EPA had not yet approved its corresponding herbicide, but nonetheless, Bayer\u2019s Monsanto urged farmers to plant its seed, claiming they would increase yields. The results of this were predictable: farmers began to use older, unapproved dicamba formulations on their new GE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":28175,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[249,114,158,69,354,5,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28167","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-agriculture","category-basf","category-bayer","category-dicamba","category-environmental-protection-agency-epa","category-genetic-engineering","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>After Court Rules Herbicide &quot;Would Tear the Social Fabric of Farming Communities,&quot; Dicamba in Genetically Engineered Crops Given Go-Ahead by EPA - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"After Court Rules Herbicide &quot;Would Tear the Social Fabric of Farming Communities,&quot; Dicamba in Genetically Engineered Crops Given Go-Ahead by EPA - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"(Beyond Pesticides, November 4, 2020) Despite a recent court ruling voiding the registration of drift-prone dicamba herbicides on genetically engineered (GE) cotton and soybeans, EPA has renewed\u00a0 the registration of these chemicals. The court\u2019s ruling stated that EPA, \u201csubstantially understated risks that it acknowledged and failed entirely to acknowledge other risks,\u201d in regards to the herbicides XtendiMax and Eugenia (dicamba), produced by agrichemical corporations Bayer and BASF for their genetically engineered (GE) crops. In announcing the decision, Administrator Andrew Wheeler said the agency made its decision \u201c[a]fter reviewing substantial amounts of new information, conducting scientific assessments based on the best available science, and carefully considering input from stakeholders.\u201d Yet, it is evident that the most important stakeholders for EPA continues to be chemical corporations. The history of dicamba\u2019s use in GE agriculture reveal this to be the case. In the mid-2010s, Bayer\u2019s Monsanto developed new dicamba-tolerant seeds and received approval to sell them from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. EPA had not yet approved its corresponding herbicide, but nonetheless, Bayer\u2019s Monsanto urged farmers to plant its seed, claiming they would increase yields. The results of this were predictable: farmers began to use older, unapproved dicamba formulations on their new GE [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-11-04T04:01:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-11-04T15:38:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/crop-plane-640x320-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"320\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Beyond Pesticides\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ByondPesticides\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ByondPesticides\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Beyond Pesticides\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Beyond Pesticides\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5c0a0981b549cc5b628770073031f4\"},\"headline\":\"After Court Rules Herbicide &#8220;Would Tear the Social Fabric of Farming Communities,&#8221; Dicamba in Genetically Engineered Crops Given Go-Ahead by EPA\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-04T04:01:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-11-04T15:38:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/\"},\"wordCount\":796,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/crop-plane-640x320-1.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Agriculture\",\"BASF\",\"Bayer\",\"Dicamba\",\"Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)\",\"Genetic Engineering\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/\",\"name\":\"After Court Rules Herbicide \\\"Would Tear the Social Fabric of Farming Communities,\\\" Dicamba in Genetically Engineered Crops Given Go-Ahead by EPA - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/crop-plane-640x320-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-04T04:01:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-11-04T15:38:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/crop-plane-640x320-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/crop-plane-640x320-1.jpg\",\"width\":640,\"height\":320},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"After Court Rules Herbicide &#8220;Would Tear the Social Fabric of Farming Communities,&#8221; Dicamba in Genetically Engineered Crops Given Go-Ahead by EPA\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/\",\"name\":\"Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog\",\"description\":\"News on Pesticide Science, Policy and Activism\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Beyond Pesticides\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/BeyondPesticides-Logo-Stacked-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/BeyondPesticides-Logo-Stacked-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":2501,\"caption\":\"Beyond Pesticides\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/ByondPesticides\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/beyondpesticides\/?hl=en\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/beyond-pesticides\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/bpncamp\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5c0a0981b549cc5b628770073031f4\",\"name\":\"Beyond Pesticides\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e26b7558fcb265e244c6e159abe5f0aab551822dc82fd0b1607e809bdfbed20a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e26b7558fcb265e244c6e159abe5f0aab551822dc82fd0b1607e809bdfbed20a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Beyond Pesticides\"},\"description\":\"Beyond Pesticides is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C., which works with allies in protecting public health and the environment to lead the transition to a world free of toxic pesticides. The founders, who established Beyond Pesticides (originally as National Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides) as a nonprofit membership organization in 1981, felt that without the existence of such an organized, national network, local, state and national pesticide policy would become, under chemical industry pressure, increasingly unresponsive to public health and environmental concerns. Beyond Pesticides believes that people must have a voice in decisions that affect them directly. We believe decisions should not be made for us by chemical companies or by decision-makers who either do not have all of the facts or refuse to consider them. Learn more about our work, read A Year in Review\u20142021, our accomplishments are your victories! Beyond Pesticides seeks to protect healthy air, water, land, and food for ourselves and future generations. By forging ties with governments, nonprofits, and people who rely on these natural resources, we reduce the need for unnecessary pesticide use and protect public health and the environment. Beyond Pesticides provides hands-on services to the public and supports local action by: identifying and interpreting hazards; and, designing safe pest management programs. With the information provided by Beyond Pesticides, people may not only be able to make informed choices and adopt practices that protect themselves and their families from unnecessary exposure to pesticides, but they will be able to effect changes on community-wide pest management decisions and policies that govern pesticide use, such as pesticide uses in parks, schools, for community insect control and along roadsides. Beyond Pesticides believes that people must have a voice in decisions which affect them directly.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\/\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/beyondpesticides\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/beyond-pesticides\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/ByondPesticides\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/bpncamp\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/author\/beyond-pesticides\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"After Court Rules Herbicide \"Would Tear the Social Fabric of Farming Communities,\" Dicamba in Genetically Engineered Crops Given Go-Ahead by EPA - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"After Court Rules Herbicide \"Would Tear the Social Fabric of Farming Communities,\" Dicamba in Genetically Engineered Crops Given Go-Ahead by EPA - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","og_description":"(Beyond Pesticides, November 4, 2020) Despite a recent court ruling voiding the registration of drift-prone dicamba herbicides on genetically engineered (GE) cotton and soybeans, EPA has renewed\u00a0 the registration of these chemicals. The court\u2019s ruling stated that EPA, \u201csubstantially understated risks that it acknowledged and failed entirely to acknowledge other risks,\u201d in regards to the herbicides XtendiMax and Eugenia (dicamba), produced by agrichemical corporations Bayer and BASF for their genetically engineered (GE) crops. In announcing the decision, Administrator Andrew Wheeler said the agency made its decision \u201c[a]fter reviewing substantial amounts of new information, conducting scientific assessments based on the best available science, and carefully considering input from stakeholders.\u201d Yet, it is evident that the most important stakeholders for EPA continues to be chemical corporations. The history of dicamba\u2019s use in GE agriculture reveal this to be the case. In the mid-2010s, Bayer\u2019s Monsanto developed new dicamba-tolerant seeds and received approval to sell them from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. EPA had not yet approved its corresponding herbicide, but nonetheless, Bayer\u2019s Monsanto urged farmers to plant its seed, claiming they would increase yields. The results of this were predictable: farmers began to use older, unapproved dicamba formulations on their new GE [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/","og_site_name":"Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\/","article_published_time":"2020-11-04T04:01:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-11-04T15:38:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":320,"url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/crop-plane-640x320-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Beyond Pesticides","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ByondPesticides","twitter_site":"@ByondPesticides","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Beyond Pesticides","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/"},"author":{"name":"Beyond Pesticides","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5c0a0981b549cc5b628770073031f4"},"headline":"After Court Rules Herbicide &#8220;Would Tear the Social Fabric of Farming Communities,&#8221; Dicamba in Genetically Engineered Crops Given Go-Ahead by EPA","datePublished":"2020-11-04T04:01:35+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-04T15:38:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/"},"wordCount":796,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/crop-plane-640x320-1.jpg","articleSection":["Agriculture","BASF","Bayer","Dicamba","Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)","Genetic Engineering"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/","name":"After Court Rules Herbicide \"Would Tear the Social Fabric of Farming Communities,\" Dicamba in Genetically Engineered Crops Given Go-Ahead by EPA - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/crop-plane-640x320-1.jpg","datePublished":"2020-11-04T04:01:35+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-04T15:38:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/crop-plane-640x320-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/crop-plane-640x320-1.jpg","width":640,"height":320},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/11\/after-court-rules-herbicide-would-tear-the-social-fabric-of-farming-communities-dicamba-in-genetically-engineered-crops-given-go-ahead-by-epa\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"After Court Rules Herbicide &#8220;Would Tear the Social Fabric of Farming Communities,&#8221; Dicamba in Genetically Engineered Crops Given Go-Ahead by EPA"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/","name":"Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","description":"News on Pesticide Science, Policy and Activism","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization","name":"Beyond Pesticides","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/BeyondPesticides-Logo-Stacked-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/BeyondPesticides-Logo-Stacked-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":2501,"caption":"Beyond Pesticides"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides","https:\/\/x.com\/ByondPesticides","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/beyondpesticides\/?hl=en","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/beyond-pesticides","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/bpncamp"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5c0a0981b549cc5b628770073031f4","name":"Beyond Pesticides","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e26b7558fcb265e244c6e159abe5f0aab551822dc82fd0b1607e809bdfbed20a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e26b7558fcb265e244c6e159abe5f0aab551822dc82fd0b1607e809bdfbed20a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Beyond Pesticides"},"description":"Beyond Pesticides is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C., which works with allies in protecting public health and the environment to lead the transition to a world free of toxic pesticides. The founders, who established Beyond Pesticides (originally as National Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides) as a nonprofit membership organization in 1981, felt that without the existence of such an organized, national network, local, state and national pesticide policy would become, under chemical industry pressure, increasingly unresponsive to public health and environmental concerns. Beyond Pesticides believes that people must have a voice in decisions that affect them directly. We believe decisions should not be made for us by chemical companies or by decision-makers who either do not have all of the facts or refuse to consider them. Learn more about our work, read A Year in Review\u20142021, our accomplishments are your victories! Beyond Pesticides seeks to protect healthy air, water, land, and food for ourselves and future generations. By forging ties with governments, nonprofits, and people who rely on these natural resources, we reduce the need for unnecessary pesticide use and protect public health and the environment. Beyond Pesticides provides hands-on services to the public and supports local action by: identifying and interpreting hazards; and, designing safe pest management programs. With the information provided by Beyond Pesticides, people may not only be able to make informed choices and adopt practices that protect themselves and their families from unnecessary exposure to pesticides, but they will be able to effect changes on community-wide pest management decisions and policies that govern pesticide use, such as pesticide uses in parks, schools, for community insect control and along roadsides. Beyond Pesticides believes that people must have a voice in decisions which affect them directly.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/beyondpesticides\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/beyond-pesticides\/","https:\/\/x.com\/ByondPesticides","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/bpncamp\/"],"url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/author\/beyond-pesticides\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28167","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28167"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28167\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28177,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28167\/revisions\/28177"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/28175"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28167"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28167"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28167"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}