{"id":29482,"date":"2021-07-09T00:01:58","date_gmt":"2021-07-09T04:01:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/?p=29482"},"modified":"2021-07-09T14:22:43","modified_gmt":"2021-07-09T18:22:43","slug":"epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/","title":{"rendered":"EPA Agenda Undermined by Its Embrace of Industry Influence, Article Documents"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n<p>(<em>Beyond Pesticides<\/em>, July 9, 2021) The investigative online publication <em>The Intercept<\/em> has turned its attention to the current and historical role of industry in distorting, undermining, and outright suppressing the protective function of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with regard to pesticide exposures. The subsequent reporting \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">\u201cThe Department of Yes: How Pesticide Companies Corrupted the EPA and Poisoned America\u201d<\/a> \u2014 is a devastating chronicle of the theme and particulars that Beyond Pesticides has covered for years. That is, that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org\/assets\/media\/documents\/bp-37.4-w17-Assault.pdf\">EPA has repeatedly disregarded its charge to protect human and environmental health in favor of\u00a0<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org\/assets\/media\/documents\/bp-37.4-w17-Assault.pdf\">enabling industry<\/a> to continue its chemical experimentation on the populace and on the nation\u2019s multiple natural resources. This pattern must change if the agency is to enact its mission and the public is to be protected.<\/p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\"><em>The Intercept<\/em> interviewed<\/a> more than 24 people with expertise on the regulation of pesticides, including 14 who have worked in EPA\u2019s Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP). The chief takeaway from those interviews, as written by reporter <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/staff\/sharonlerner\/\">Sharon Lerner<\/a>, is that EPA \u201cis often unable to stand up to the intense pressures from powerful agrochemical companies, which spend tens of millions of dollars on lobbying each year and employ many former EPA scientists once they leave the agency. The enormous corporate influence has weakened and, in some cases, shut down the meaningful regulation of pesticides in the U.S. and left the country\u2019s residents exposed to levels of dangerous chemicals not tolerated in many other nations.\u201d<\/p>\r\n<p><em>The Intercept<\/em> cites several top-level examples of EPA\u2019s failures to protect, unearthed during the research for the article:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>waiver, at industry request, of the vast majority of toxicity tests that could yield useful information on pesticide impacts<\/li>\r\n\t<li>squelching of an internal report warning of the link between <a href=\"https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org\/resources\/pesticide-gateway?pesticideid=37\">glyphosate<\/a> and cancer<\/li>\r\n\t<li>refusal to investigate\u00a0evidence of carcinogenicity for another ingredient in Monsanto\u2019s glyphosate-based product, Roundup<\/li>\r\n\t<li>failure to review evidence of brain-damaging impacts of\u00a0a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org\/programs\/bee-protective-pollinators-and-pesticides\/chemicals-implicated\">neonicotinoid<\/a> pesticide<\/li>\r\n\t<li>dismissal of scientific research demonstrating that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org\/resources\/pesticide-gateway?pesticideid=44\">malathion<\/a> causes cancer<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>An especially egregious example of EPA\u2019s abdication of its protective mission is its record on the organophosphate insecticide, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org\/resources\/pesticide-gateway?pesticideid=17\">chlorpyrifos<\/a>. The compound acts on pests by inhibiting the function of acetylcholinesterase, an enzyme essential to normal nerve pulse transmission, by binding irreversibly to receptor sites for that enzyme. In that action, it inactivates the enzyme, damages the central and peripheral nervous systems, and disrupts neurological activity.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org\/resources\/pesticide-gateway?pesticideid=17\">Chlorpyrifos is associated with harmful<\/a>\u00a0reproductive, renal, hepatic, and endocrine disrupting effects, and most notably, with neurodevelopmental impacts, especially in children. It is a neurological toxicant that damages their brains and leads to compromised cognitive function, attention deficit disorder, developmental delays, lowered IQs, and a host of other developmental and learning anomalies.<\/p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">Ms. Lerner interviewed Lianne Sheppard, PhD<\/a>, a professor and biostatistician at the University of Washington who led 2020 research that investigated a 1972 study that ultimately became foundational to EPA\u2019s approach to the notorious organophosphate. That 1972 research \u2014 by Frederick Coulston, a professor at Albany Medical College \u2014 was commissioned by Dow Chemical, the manufacturer of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org\/assets\/media\/documents\/bp-37.4-w17-Chlorpyrifos-cited.pdf\">chlorpyrifos<\/a> in the late 1960s. Dr. Sheppard attempted to reproduce the results represented by the study data, but could not.<\/p>\r\n<p>Further investigation showed that the paper on that research \u2014 which was actually written by Dow statisticians \u2014 had left out of the data analysis critical information that caused resultant EPA safe exposure limits (\u201cno observed adverse effect levels,\u201d or NOELs) to be, <a href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/08\/epa-relied-on-flawed-analysis-to-allow-use-of-the-neurotoxic-insecticide-chlorpyrifos\/\">as Beyond Pesticide<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/08\/epa-relied-on-flawed-analysis-to-allow-use-of-the-neurotoxic-insecticide-chlorpyrifos\/\">s wrote<\/a>, \u201cflat out wrong.\u201d In their 2020 peer-reviewed paper, <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">Dr. Sheppard and her co-authors concluded<\/a> that \u201cthe omission of valid data without justification was a form of data falsification.\u201d By 2020, however, massive on-the-ground damage had been done because of EPA\u2019s adoption of the NOELs \u201cjustified\u201d by the erroneous data in that paper. And at EPA, presumably, either no one noticed, or no one cared to do anything about it.<\/p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\"><em>The Intercept<\/em> article summarizes<\/a>: \u201cOn one level, the story of the Coultson paper is simple: Decades ago, a seemingly small omission happened to slip past regulators. And yet the consequences of that one statistical sleight of hand, and the government\u2019s failure to notice it, are immense. Between 1992\u00a0and 2017, chlorpyrifos was one of the most heavily used pesticides in the U.S., with some\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/water.usgs.gov\/nawqa\/pnsp\/usage\/maps\/show_map.php?year=2017&amp;map=CHLORPYRIFOS&amp;hilo=L&amp;disp=Chlorpyrifos\">450 million pounds<\/a>\u00a0of it sprayed on crops. Countless children and pregnant\u00a0people were exposed to what we now know were unsafe levels. And those exposures have since been found to increase the risk of a wide range of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC3237355\/\">neurodevelopmental problems<\/a>\u00a0in children, including ADHD and other attention disorders, autism, tremors, and intelligence deficits, as well as memory and motor problems. Although the true toll of that brain damage is incalculable, pediatrician and environmental health researcher Leonardo Trasande <a href=\"https:\/\/pdfs.semanticscholar.org\/2844\/472a252136c1b73196bbd10468a47373c54d.pdf\">estimates<\/a>\u00a0that exposure to organophosphate pesticides, the class to which chlorpyrifos belongs, caused children born in the U.S. in a single year \u2014 2010 \u2014 to collectively lose 1.8 million IQ points, costing the country $44.7 billion in productivity, education, and health costs.\u201d<\/p>\r\n<p>The <em>Intercept<\/em> article excavates the details of EPA history of dysfunction related to other dangerous pesticides, as well: glyphosate, <a href=\"https:\/\/www3.epa.gov\/pesticides\/chem_search\/reg_actions\/registration\/fs_PC-217500_01-Apr-00.pdf\">pelargonic acid<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org\/resources\/pesticide-gateway?pesticideid=44\">malathion<\/a>, and the neonicotinoid class of insecticides. It also calls out industry practice (and EPA\u2019s assent) to the ongoing \u201csubstitution\u201d of a newer pesticide or a <a href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2019\/10\/in-response-to-a-lawsuit-epa-proposes-review-process-for-evaluating-the-effects-of-multiple-pesticide-ingredients-on-nontarget-organisms\/\">combined protocol<\/a> (using two pesticides together, mixed either in formulation or on site) to replace a problematic one.<\/p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">The scientists with whom Ms. Lerner talked reported<\/a> \u201cimmense pressure from within the agency to overlook the risks they found. And several said they faced retribution for calling attention to the dangers of pesticides. \u2018If you bring something up that\u2019s an inconvenient truth, you get circumvented for any kind of committee work that you would need to have to get a promotion,\u2019 one toxicologist who used to work for the agency\u2019s pesticide office told <em>The Intercept<\/em>. \u2018It is the unwritten rule that to get promotions, all pesticides need to pass.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\r\n<p>Interviewees also noted that such pressure sometimes comes from members of Congress, who contact the agency on behalf of pesticide companies whose products are in review; staff have called such cases \u201cyes packages\u201d \u2014 those that \u201cmust\u201d be approved, regardless of the science that is supposed to underlie all regulatory decisions. <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">The article cites an example<\/a> of a \u201cyes package\u201d for a pesticide to treat a papaya virus (which was destroying the crop in Hawaii). No studies of its safety had been conducted, yet EPA managers insisted that agency scientists sign off on its approval. <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">Said one EPA scientist interviewed<\/a>, \u201cThe rest of us are sitting around thinking, \u2018OK, you hire the scientists to do the work, and now you\u2019re telling us as regulatory people to make it fit? We\u2019re flat out telling you that\u2019s not OK.\u2019\u201d The company never did submit any data, and that pesticide was approved for use.<\/p>\r\n<p>Ms. Lerner points out that EPA showed a \u201cpromising start\u201d after its 1970 launch. <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">She notes<\/a>, \u201cIn its first decade, the EPA canceled the registration of 12 pesticides, including DDT, aldrin, and dieldrin, which [Rachel] Carson had written about at length. In those early years, the regulatory agency had the power to inspire fear in chemical companies.\u201d But subsequently, in the 1980s, the pace of removal of toxic pesticides from use slowed considerably, with a mere eight being canceled during that decade. From 2000 to 2010, four have\u00a0been removed, and from 2010\u20132020, exactly one has been deregistered for use.<\/p>\r\n<p>Since 1970, EPA has canceled only 37 of the many thousands of pesticides on the market; EPA maintains that it has cancelled 40 \u201cpesticide products.\u201d Those paltry numbers stack up against the 16,800 pesticide products and 1,200 active ingredients <a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/sites\/production\/files\/2020-11\/documents\/frrc_presentation_november_2020.v4_accessible.pdf\">overseen by EPA<\/a>. Once a leader in environmental protections, the U.S. now trails other countries with significant agricultural economies in its protections against toxic pesticides.<\/p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/ehjournal.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12940-019-0488-0\">A 2019 study<\/a> by Dr. Nathan Donley of the Center for Biological Diversity noted that, in 2016, the U.S. used more than 300 million pounds of pesticides <em>banned by other countries <\/em>\u2014 largely for environmental and health reasons. Dr. Donley told Ms. Lerner that \u201cat least 85\u00a0pesticides banned in China, Brazil, or the European Union were still used in the U.S. in 2016, a number that has almost certainly increased since then.\u201d EPA\u2019s regulatory activity <a href=\"https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org\/assets\/media\/documents\/bp-37.4-w17-EPA.pdf\">took a dramatic dive<\/a> during the Trump administration.<\/p>\r\n<p>The role of the pesticide industry in such EPA failings is not to be underestimated; indeed, industry was courted at EPA from 2017 through 2020. From the 1960s\u2019 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nrdc.org\/stories\/story-silent-spring\">attacks on Rachel Carson for her book, <em>Silent Spring<\/em><\/a>, which called out the industry for its devastation of the natural world through its products, the agrochemical industry has engaged in aggressive and unethical behaviors to pursue its one goal, profit, at the expense of human health, ecological, and biodiversity devastation.<\/p>\r\n<p>Monsanto (now owned by Bayer) has gussied up that goal as the \u201cfreedom to operate.\u201d A spokesperson for <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">Bayer responded to an inquiry from Ms. Lerner with this<\/a>: \u201cLike many companies and organizations operating in highly regulated industries, we provide information and contribute to science-based policymaking and regulatory processes. Our engagements with all those in the public sector are routine, professional, and consistent with all laws and regulations.\u201d<\/p>\r\n<p>But the record shows otherwise. In the past two decades, in particular, pesticide companies have exerted unrelenting pushback against almost any proposed regulatory actions, and have used a raft of unsavory tactics to do so. Among them, as the article notes, are \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/08\/01\/business\/monsantos-sway-over-research-is-seen-in-disclosed-emails.html\">ghostwriting<\/a>\u00a0purportedly independent scientific papers,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.rollingstone.com\/politics\/politics-features\/monsanto-cancer-710902\/\">cozying up<\/a>\u00a0to regulators, and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2019\/jun\/02\/monsanto-manipulates-journalists-academics\">attempting to discredit journalists<\/a>\u00a0who exposed the dangers of Monsanto\u2019s products.\u201d Beyond Pesticides has written about these tactics in its Daily News Blog in <a href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2017\/10\/scientists-urge-retraction-journal-article-glyphosates-safety-surreptitiously-written-monsanto\/\">2017<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/12\/investigation-on-weed-killer-dicamba-adds-to-pattern-of-corporate-deception-on-pesticide-hazards\/\">2020<\/a>, and in its journal, <em>Pesticides and You<\/em>, in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org\/assets\/media\/documents\/bp-37.4-w17-Assault.pdf\">2018<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n<p>Monsanto\/Bayer has hardly been alone in such campaigns; Dow, Corteva, Syngenta, and others participate, as well. As Charles Benbrook, PhD, a long-time agricultural economist who has investigated the pesticide industry\u2019s \u201clegislative\/regulatory pressure activities,\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">notes<\/a>: \u201cThe regulatory affairs staff of all of these major chemical companies have a very clear job: to propose and gain approval of registrations that expand the ways and places and times that the company\u2019s products can be used and to keep all existing registrations fully in place and resist any changes in labels . . . that might cost them a percent or two in market share. . . . [They] constantly regurgitate their own spin on the science. And they refer to papers that they get into the journals that have been either commissioned or partially or wholly ghostwritten.\u201d<\/p>\r\n<p>The companies (and\/or their trade associations) also court regulators directly by taking them on junkets so they can \u201cget to know\u201d the farms and farmers that use pesticides. One EPA scientist <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">quoted in the article said<\/a>, \u201cIt felt kind of brain-washy. By the end, I thought, \u2018You really do need these chemicals, otherwise you\u2019ll have crop failure.\u2019\u201d Pesticide company representatives are also apparently in the actual EPA headquarters in DC all the time, according to Ms. Lerner\u2019s reporting.<\/p>\r\n<p>\u201cThe representatives of the companies are usually, though not always, friendly and eager to help, according to several scientists who have worked at the agency\u2019s pesticide office. \u2018When you come into the lobby, many times there\u2019s a chemical or ag lobbyist there. They just bop in,\u2019 <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">said Karen McCormack<\/a>, a scientist who retired from the EPA in 2017 after working on pesticides for 40 years. \u2018They want to be your friend. They always compliment you. But if you don\u2019t do what they want, they\u2019ll go to your boss or above your boss and say, \u201cWe can\u2019t work with you anymore.\u201d And you\u2019ll be taken off the project and put on something that\u2019s meaningless.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\r\n<p>Achieving waivers of toxicity testing is another front in industry\u2019s efforts. <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">The article reports<\/a>, \u201cThe EPA\u2019s pesticide office granted 972 industry requests to waive toxicity tests between December 2011 and May 2018,\u00a089 percent of all requests made.\u00a0Among the tests on pesticides that were never performed were\u00a090 percent of tests looking for developmental neurotoxicity, 92 percent of chronic cancer studies, and 97 percent of studies looking at how pesticides harm the immune system.\u201d Allowing pesticides to come onto market without testing them for toxicities is a gross violation of EPA\u2019s charge. But industry is all about it, and they appear to have had managers in the agency who shared their enthusiasm. Below is a 2018 email invitation to other EPA OPP managers \u201cto celebrate what many people concerned about\u00a0exposure to\u00a0pesticides\u00a0would consider a grim landmark: having waived 1,000 toxicity tests.\u201d<\/p>\r\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright  wp-image-29498\" src=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EPA.1000waived.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"395\" height=\"456\" \/><\/p>\r\n<p>Ms. Lerner also reports on internal agency retaliation against employees who raise concerns about EPA\u2019s ignoring of pesticide risks, waiving testing, etc. This happens in the forms of removal from committees (or not being appointed to them despite the individual\u2019s relevance and expertise); being passed over for promotion; being \u201cwritten up\u201d for imagined infractions, or being moved (e.g., demoted) to other positions, among others. Executive Director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility Tim Whitehouse indicates that the organization has recently received multiple inquiries and reports from employees in OPP. <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">He commented<\/a>, \u201cCurrent and former employees have been reaching out to us in increasing numbers and expressing concerns about the office culture at OPP and the fact that if scientists speak out about their concerns, they will not last long in that division. Morale has been bad, and it\u2019s getting steadily worse over the years.\u201d<\/p>\r\n<p>Another problem in the EPA\u2013industry landscape is the \u201crevolving door\u201d of personnel moving from EPA to industry and its trade groups, and vice versa, an issue that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org\/assets\/media\/documents\/bp-37.3-fa17-EPA.pdf\">Beyond Pesticides has called out<\/a>. \u201cSince 1974, all seven of the [OPP\u2019s] directors who continued to work after leaving the agency went on to make money from the pesticide companies they used to regulate,\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">reports <em>The Intercept<\/em>.<\/a> Many other officials from EPA have joined the ranks in the agrochemical industry over the decades. \u201cThe problem with this continuous flow of experts from the government to pesticide companies \u2014 and sometimes back again \u2014 isn\u2019t just that it can enable dangerous chemicals to evade regulatory scrutiny but that it also shapes the culture within the agency. \u2018Management officials graduate and move to direct hires with the registrants,\u2019\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">according to Bill Hirzy<\/a>, a 27-year veteran of EPA. \u201c\u2018So these management officials are loath to take any action that is likely to limit their post-EPA employment opportunities.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\r\n<p>The article suggests that the long-standing, and unofficial but real, enmeshment between the agency and industry helps explain the persistence of poor regulatory performance across multiple federal administrations and the agendas that come with them, including the Biden administration, which has pledged to address the scientific integrity issues at EPA. Lori Ann Burd of the Center or Biological Diversity <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">notes that she has clocked only\u00a0minor differences<\/a> to date in EPA\u2019s approach to pesticides under President Joe Biden\u2019s administration. \u201cThey\u2019re taking a slightly different tone.\u00a0But in our litigation, it\u2019s the same brass knuckles, fight to the death over everything.\u201d<\/p>\r\n<p>The sheer volume of data and information with which EPA has to contend is another hurdle identified by <em>The Intercept<\/em>. Corporations are, Ms. Lerner notes, far more powerful and better resourced than the federal agency responsible for regulating them, and can easily generate and submit volumes of information that EPA does not have enough funding, and therefore, staff hours, to evaluate effectively. Ms. McCormack (the retired EPA scientist mentioned previously) <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">commented<\/a>, \u201cThere aren\u2019t enough resources to go through all the studies. And there isn\u2019t enough time. What happens then is that people at EPA look at what the [hired external] contractors said and decide whether to accept it or not. For the most part, they just [do].\u201d<\/p>\r\n<p>A further hitch in EPA functioning is the 1947 federal law, FIFRA, itself; it is the authorizing legislation for the oversight and regulation of pesticides. FIFRA (The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) was not written with health or environmental protection as its goals. It was written, <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">according to Scott Faber of the Environmental Working Group<\/a>, \u201cto protect farmers and encourage pesticide companies to bring new products to the market. . . . FIFRA is encoded to approve pesticides.\u201d<\/p>\r\n<p>FIFRA says that EPA can refuse to register a pesticide only if the adverse effects it causes (on human health, wildlife, or the environment) outweigh the benefits its use confers (measured in terms of crop yield and quality). <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">Ms. Lerner writes<\/a>, \u201cSo even if a pesticide presents a clear danger, the agency often finds that the danger is outweighed by whatever economic advantages it offers.\u201d EarthJustice attorney Patti Goldman said that EPA looks for ways to \u201cbalance out\u201d risks\u00a0it identifies so as to avoid having to take pesticides off the market. <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">She says<\/a>, \u201cIf EPA finds risk, it will look at benefits to growers. You get to the end, and EPA says the company is willing to use a little less, or use it a little less often, or they\u2019ll put a little bit of a buffer around schools, or require some protective clothing, and then they\u2019ll just say we find the risk is less than the benefits. It\u2019s unprincipled.\u201d<\/p>\r\n<p>Beyond Pesticides asserts that EPA must, in evaluating the \u201creasonableness\u201d of identified risks of pesticides, balance them against the risks presented by other systems. For example, it is obvious that organic farmers raise any and all of the crops in question without toxic pesticides, and therefore, this approach carries none of the identified risks of pesticide use. The serious adverse effects of a given pesticide are necessarily, then, unreasonable \u2014 unless EPA can demonstrate that the pesticide can be deployed in a way that eliminates those risks.<\/p>\r\n<p>The chickens (of decades of toxic, poorly regulated pesticide use) have begun to come home to roost \u2014 in the form of increasing numbers and varieties of lawsuits against manufacturers from people who have been harmed. (See, for example, Beyond Pesticides\u2019 coverage of the legion of litigation on <a href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2019\/03\/another-study-links-glyphosate-to-cancer\/\">glyphosate<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2020\/02\/hey-farmer-farmer-put-away-that-dicamba-weed-killer\/\">dicamba<\/a>.)<\/p>\r\n<p>These serious harms have occurred through no fault of the sufferers, but via the combined effects of shameless industry practices and an EPA that is not sufficiently and appropriately resourced \u2014 culturally, managerially, statutorily, or funds-wise \u2014 to achieve its mission.<\/p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">Dr. Benbrook asserts<\/a> that the \u201cinescapable problem is the financial mismatch between the underfunded government agency and the immense corporations that continue to outfox, outmaneuver, and vastly outspend it. How can EPA fight these major chemical companies when they are willing to spend an amount of money that is roughly equivalent to the entire Office of Pesticide Programs annual budget to defend just one chemical?\u201d<\/p>\r\n<p>One solution is for EPA to recalibrate itself in alignment with a precautionary approach, and to move aggressively and authoritatively on its protective mission. Others are: Congressional funding of the agency at levels required to perform well; amendment of FIFRA; and EPA Office of the Inspector General and Congressional crackdowns on the ability of industry to interact with the agency, and on the ability of the revolving door to continue to operate. The public can pressure elected officials to take up such measures; find your Senator and Representatives <a href=\"https:\/\/www.govtrack.us\/congress\/members\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/\">https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/06\/30\/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp\/<\/a><\/p>\r\n<p><em>All unattributed positions and opinions in this piece are those of Beyond Pesticides.<\/em><\/p>\r\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\r\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Beyond Pesticides, July 9, 2021) The investigative online publication The Intercept has turned its attention to the current and historical role of industry in distorting, undermining, and outright suppressing the protective function of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with regard to pesticide exposures. The subsequent reporting \u2014 \u201cThe Department of Yes: How Pesticide Companies Corrupted the EPA and Poisoned America\u201d \u2014 is a devastating chronicle of the theme and particulars that Beyond Pesticides has covered for years. That is, that EPA has repeatedly disregarded its charge to protect human and environmental health in favor of\u00a0enabling industry to continue its chemical experimentation on the populace and on the nation\u2019s multiple natural resources. This pattern must change if the agency is to enact its mission and the public is to be protected. The Intercept interviewed more than 24 people with expertise on the regulation of pesticides, including 14 who have worked in EPA\u2019s Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP). The chief takeaway from those interviews, as written by reporter Sharon Lerner, is that EPA \u201cis often unable to stand up to the intense pressures from powerful agrochemical companies, which spend tens of millions of dollars on lobbying each year and employ many [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":29497,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[354,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29482","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-environmental-protection-agency-epa","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>EPA Agenda Undermined by Its Embrace of Industry Influence, Article Documents - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"EPA Agenda Undermined by Its Embrace of Industry Influence, Article Documents - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"(Beyond Pesticides, July 9, 2021) The investigative online publication The Intercept has turned its attention to the current and historical role of industry in distorting, undermining, and outright suppressing the protective function of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with regard to pesticide exposures. The subsequent reporting \u2014 \u201cThe Department of Yes: How Pesticide Companies Corrupted the EPA and Poisoned America\u201d \u2014 is a devastating chronicle of the theme and particulars that Beyond Pesticides has covered for years. That is, that EPA has repeatedly disregarded its charge to protect human and environmental health in favor of\u00a0enabling industry to continue its chemical experimentation on the populace and on the nation\u2019s multiple natural resources. This pattern must change if the agency is to enact its mission and the public is to be protected. The Intercept interviewed more than 24 people with expertise on the regulation of pesticides, including 14 who have worked in EPA\u2019s Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP). The chief takeaway from those interviews, as written by reporter Sharon Lerner, is that EPA \u201cis often unable to stand up to the intense pressures from powerful agrochemical companies, which spend tens of millions of dollars on lobbying each year and employ many [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-07-09T04:01:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-07-09T18:22:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EPA.UncleSam.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Beyond Pesticides\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ByondPesticides\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ByondPesticides\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Beyond Pesticides\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Beyond Pesticides\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5c0a0981b549cc5b628770073031f4\"},\"headline\":\"EPA Agenda Undermined by Its Embrace of Industry Influence, Article Documents\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-09T04:01:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-07-09T18:22:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/\"},\"wordCount\":3193,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EPA.UncleSam.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/\",\"name\":\"EPA Agenda Undermined by Its Embrace of Industry Influence, Article Documents - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EPA.UncleSam.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-09T04:01:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-07-09T18:22:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EPA.UncleSam.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EPA.UncleSam.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"EPA Agenda Undermined by Its Embrace of Industry Influence, Article Documents\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/\",\"name\":\"Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog\",\"description\":\"News on Pesticide Science, Policy and Activism\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Beyond Pesticides\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/BeyondPesticides-Logo-Stacked-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/BeyondPesticides-Logo-Stacked-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":2501,\"caption\":\"Beyond Pesticides\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/ByondPesticides\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/beyondpesticides\/?hl=en\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/beyond-pesticides\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/bpncamp\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5c0a0981b549cc5b628770073031f4\",\"name\":\"Beyond Pesticides\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e26b7558fcb265e244c6e159abe5f0aab551822dc82fd0b1607e809bdfbed20a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e26b7558fcb265e244c6e159abe5f0aab551822dc82fd0b1607e809bdfbed20a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Beyond Pesticides\"},\"description\":\"Beyond Pesticides is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C., which works with allies in protecting public health and the environment to lead the transition to a world free of toxic pesticides. The founders, who established Beyond Pesticides (originally as National Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides) as a nonprofit membership organization in 1981, felt that without the existence of such an organized, national network, local, state and national pesticide policy would become, under chemical industry pressure, increasingly unresponsive to public health and environmental concerns. Beyond Pesticides believes that people must have a voice in decisions that affect them directly. We believe decisions should not be made for us by chemical companies or by decision-makers who either do not have all of the facts or refuse to consider them. Learn more about our work, read A Year in Review\u20142021, our accomplishments are your victories! Beyond Pesticides seeks to protect healthy air, water, land, and food for ourselves and future generations. By forging ties with governments, nonprofits, and people who rely on these natural resources, we reduce the need for unnecessary pesticide use and protect public health and the environment. Beyond Pesticides provides hands-on services to the public and supports local action by: identifying and interpreting hazards; and, designing safe pest management programs. With the information provided by Beyond Pesticides, people may not only be able to make informed choices and adopt practices that protect themselves and their families from unnecessary exposure to pesticides, but they will be able to effect changes on community-wide pest management decisions and policies that govern pesticide use, such as pesticide uses in parks, schools, for community insect control and along roadsides. Beyond Pesticides believes that people must have a voice in decisions which affect them directly.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\/\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/beyondpesticides\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/beyond-pesticides\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/ByondPesticides\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/bpncamp\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/author\/beyond-pesticides\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"EPA Agenda Undermined by Its Embrace of Industry Influence, Article Documents - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"EPA Agenda Undermined by Its Embrace of Industry Influence, Article Documents - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","og_description":"(Beyond Pesticides, July 9, 2021) The investigative online publication The Intercept has turned its attention to the current and historical role of industry in distorting, undermining, and outright suppressing the protective function of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with regard to pesticide exposures. The subsequent reporting \u2014 \u201cThe Department of Yes: How Pesticide Companies Corrupted the EPA and Poisoned America\u201d \u2014 is a devastating chronicle of the theme and particulars that Beyond Pesticides has covered for years. That is, that EPA has repeatedly disregarded its charge to protect human and environmental health in favor of\u00a0enabling industry to continue its chemical experimentation on the populace and on the nation\u2019s multiple natural resources. This pattern must change if the agency is to enact its mission and the public is to be protected. The Intercept interviewed more than 24 people with expertise on the regulation of pesticides, including 14 who have worked in EPA\u2019s Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP). The chief takeaway from those interviews, as written by reporter Sharon Lerner, is that EPA \u201cis often unable to stand up to the intense pressures from powerful agrochemical companies, which spend tens of millions of dollars on lobbying each year and employ many [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/","og_site_name":"Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\/","article_published_time":"2021-07-09T04:01:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-07-09T18:22:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EPA.UncleSam.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Beyond Pesticides","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ByondPesticides","twitter_site":"@ByondPesticides","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Beyond Pesticides","Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/"},"author":{"name":"Beyond Pesticides","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5c0a0981b549cc5b628770073031f4"},"headline":"EPA Agenda Undermined by Its Embrace of Industry Influence, Article Documents","datePublished":"2021-07-09T04:01:58+00:00","dateModified":"2021-07-09T18:22:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/"},"wordCount":3193,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EPA.UncleSam.jpg","articleSection":["Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/","name":"EPA Agenda Undermined by Its Embrace of Industry Influence, Article Documents - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EPA.UncleSam.jpg","datePublished":"2021-07-09T04:01:58+00:00","dateModified":"2021-07-09T18:22:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EPA.UncleSam.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EPA.UncleSam.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2021\/07\/epa-agenda-undermined-by-its-embrace-of-industry-influence-article-documents\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"EPA Agenda Undermined by Its Embrace of Industry Influence, Article Documents"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/","name":"Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","description":"News on Pesticide Science, Policy and Activism","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization","name":"Beyond Pesticides","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/BeyondPesticides-Logo-Stacked-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/BeyondPesticides-Logo-Stacked-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":2501,"caption":"Beyond Pesticides"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides","https:\/\/x.com\/ByondPesticides","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/beyondpesticides\/?hl=en","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/beyond-pesticides","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/bpncamp"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5c0a0981b549cc5b628770073031f4","name":"Beyond Pesticides","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e26b7558fcb265e244c6e159abe5f0aab551822dc82fd0b1607e809bdfbed20a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e26b7558fcb265e244c6e159abe5f0aab551822dc82fd0b1607e809bdfbed20a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Beyond Pesticides"},"description":"Beyond Pesticides is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C., which works with allies in protecting public health and the environment to lead the transition to a world free of toxic pesticides. The founders, who established Beyond Pesticides (originally as National Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides) as a nonprofit membership organization in 1981, felt that without the existence of such an organized, national network, local, state and national pesticide policy would become, under chemical industry pressure, increasingly unresponsive to public health and environmental concerns. Beyond Pesticides believes that people must have a voice in decisions that affect them directly. We believe decisions should not be made for us by chemical companies or by decision-makers who either do not have all of the facts or refuse to consider them. Learn more about our work, read A Year in Review\u20142021, our accomplishments are your victories! Beyond Pesticides seeks to protect healthy air, water, land, and food for ourselves and future generations. By forging ties with governments, nonprofits, and people who rely on these natural resources, we reduce the need for unnecessary pesticide use and protect public health and the environment. Beyond Pesticides provides hands-on services to the public and supports local action by: identifying and interpreting hazards; and, designing safe pest management programs. With the information provided by Beyond Pesticides, people may not only be able to make informed choices and adopt practices that protect themselves and their families from unnecessary exposure to pesticides, but they will be able to effect changes on community-wide pest management decisions and policies that govern pesticide use, such as pesticide uses in parks, schools, for community insect control and along roadsides. Beyond Pesticides believes that people must have a voice in decisions which affect them directly.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/beyondpesticides\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/beyond-pesticides\/","https:\/\/x.com\/ByondPesticides","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/bpncamp\/"],"url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/author\/beyond-pesticides\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29482","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29482"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29482\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29505,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29482\/revisions\/29505"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29497"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29482"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29482"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29482"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}