{"id":36249,"date":"2024-08-26T00:01:20","date_gmt":"2024-08-26T04:01:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/?p=36249"},"modified":"2024-08-26T17:29:40","modified_gmt":"2024-08-26T21:29:40","slug":"beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/","title":{"rendered":"Beyond Pesticides Rallies Public to Ban Weed Killer Atrazine with Standard EPA Used Earlier to Ban Dacthal"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n

(Beyond Pesticides<\/em>, August 26, 2024)\u00a0In July, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced<\/a> it was raising the allowable levels of the highly toxic weed killer atrazine in the nation\u2019s waterways from the 2016 level of 3.4 to 9.7 micrograms per liter (\u00b5g\/L), which scientists and environmental advocates say is a serious threat to aquatic plants, fish, invertebrates, and amphibians, in addition to people who recreate in waterways or eat food from them. With EPA\u2019s August 7 decision<\/a> to ban the weed killer Dacthal (or DCPA–dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate), Beyond Pesticides is rallying public support for the removal of atrazine from the market under the same standards of harm, inability to mitigate hazards, and the availability of alternatives.<\/p>\r\n

As Beyond Pesticides points out in its 2022 atrazine comments<\/a> (2020 and 2016 comments included) to EPA, the agency in November 2021 released the final Biological Evaluation (BE) assessing risks to listed species from labeled uses of atrazine (in the triazine chemical family). The agency made \u201clikely to adversely affect (LAA) determinations\u201d for 1,013 species and 328 critical habitats, which it is now rejecting, while using a \u201ccommunity-equivalent level of concern (CE-LOC)\u201d measure that is filled with uncertainty and lacks any sense of precaution with a chemical like atrazine<\/a>\u2014known to disrupt the endocrine system at miniscule doses. Meanwhile, the agency asserts mitigation measures associated with uncertain conservation practices and alleged benefits that outweigh risks. While calling for additional study of atrazine\u2019s benefits, the Northern New York Agricultural Development Program\u2019s<\/a> Field Crops IPM [Integrated Pest Management] coordinator, Mike Hunter, said in July, \u201cThe results of this limited-scope, preliminary trial demonstrated that excellent corn weed control was achievable regardless of the atrazine rate used and without inclusion of atrazine in the herbicide treatment.\u201d Beyond Pesticides points to the efficacy and profitability of organic practices and products for all crops<\/a>, turf<\/a> (see also<\/a>), and vegetation use for which atrazine is registered by EPA.<\/p>\r\n

Exposure to atrazine, manufactured by Syngenta, is widespread in the environment.\u00a0According to EPA<\/a>, \u201cPesticide products containing atrazine are registered for use on several agricultural crops, [including] field corn, sweet corn, sorghum, and sugarcane, []wheat, macadamia nuts, and guava, as well as non-agricultural uses such as nursery\/ornamental and turf.\u201d It is the second most widely used herbicide in the U.S. after glyphosate (found in Roundup), but banned in the European Union in 2004 and in\u00a0over 40 countries worldwide<\/a>.\u00a0Many organizations<\/a>\u00a0have called for the chemical to be banned in the U.S. and have joined in litigation against EPA.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

In the case of Dacthal, EPA used the \u201cimminent hazard\u201d clause of the federal pesticide law to immediately suspend the chemical’s use. At the same time, the agency is exercising its authority to prohibit the continued use of Dacthal’s existing stocks, a power that EPA rarely uses. The last time EPA issued an emergency action like this was in 1979 when the agency acknowledged miscarriages associated with the forestry use of the herbicide 2,4,5-T\u2014one-half of the chemical weed killer Agent Orange, sprayed over people to defoliate the landscape of Vietnam in the war there\u2014with the most potent form of dioxin, TCDD (2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin). The chemical manufacturer of Dacthal, AMVAC Chemical Corporation, can challenge the agency’s findings under the law and seek court review, but EPA’s action takes effect immediately while any appeal is considered. Meanwhile, EPA has stopped use under\u00a07 U.S.C. 136<\/a>\u00a0et seq<\/em>., pursuant to section 6(c)(3) (7 U.S.C. 136d(c)(3)<\/a>). (See Unit IV.) The prohibition on the use of existing stocks is mandated under\u00a0Section 6(a)(1)<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

>> EPA must apply the standard of the Dacthal decision to atrazine and issue an emergency suspension and prohibit use of existing stocks.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\r\n

The timeline for review and action on individual pesticides has taken decades since the 1972 overhaul of nation’s pesticide law, the\u00a0Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act<\/em>\u00a0(FIFRA). The law’s risk-benefit standard allows for high levels of harm, especially to farmworkers and those handling pesticides, as well as public exposure through residues in food, water, and air. EPA’s decisions are based on agency risk assessments that use flawed assumptions and ignore vulnerable populations like children and those with preexisting health conditions\u2014like cancer, endocrine system disruption, neurological illness, and other health effects that are exacerbated by exposure. Amendments to FIFRA in 1996, in the\u00a0Food Quality Protection Act<\/em>\u00a0(FQPA), have done little to reduce the ongoing reliance on toxic chemicals in food production and land management, despite the growth of the $70 billion organic industry\u2014still not considered by EPA as a legitimate alternative to be evaluated when determining the \u201creasonableness\u201d or \u201cacceptability\u201d of risk under pesticide law. Instead, EPA calculates acceptability of risk in the context of available\u00a0alternative chemicals<\/em>. In its press release on the Dacthal decision, EPA said, \u201cIn deciding whether to issue today’s Emergency Order, EPA consulted with the U.S. Department of Agriculture to understand how growers use DCPA and alternatives to this pesticide.\u201d The agency’s consultation with USDA evaluated alternative chemicals, not alternative organic management systems and organic-compatible substances.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

The current mechanism that EPA uses to restrict pesticides\u2014negotiated settlements instead of regulatory action\u2014compromises the health of people and the environment, often disproportionately for people of color and workers, who are the first to be exposed as applicators or agricultural workers. Could the Dacthal decision be a watershed moment to change a regulatory process that allows daily pesticide exposure, poisoning, and contamination at rates that EPA deems acceptable\u2014despite the\u00a0overwhelming science<\/a>\u00a0linking real-world pesticide use (homes, parks and playing fields, schools, and farms) to dreaded illnesses, biodiversity collapse, and the climate crisis? (See\u00a0Pesticide-Induced Diseases Database<\/a>\u00a0and the\u00a0Pesticide Gateway<\/a>.)\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

In making its decision to ban Dacthal, EPA states that it considered:\u00a0
\r\n<\/strong>1. The seriousness of the threatened harm;\u00a0
\r\n2.\u00a0The immediacy of the threatened harm;\u00a0
\r\n3.\u00a0The probability that the threatened harm will occur;\u00a0
\r\n4.\u00a0The benefits to the public of the continued use of the pesticide; and\u00a0
\r\n5.\u00a0The nature and extent of the information before the Agency at the time it makes a decision.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

These criteria could be met for most of the pesticides for which EPA has negotiated settlements with pesticide manufacturers, resulting in partial withdrawals of pesticides from the market and compromises that threaten health and the environment.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

Atrazine poses immediate serious harms to people and the environment.<\/strong>\u00a0
\r\nRegistration of the endocrine-disrupting herbicide propazine (in the triazine family of frog-deforming endocrine disruptors)\u00a0was canceled by EPA<\/a>, eliminating use of the hazardous herbicide by the end of 2022. However, all pesticides in the triazine class, including atrazine and simazine, have similar properties and should be eliminated from use.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

Under an\u00a0Endangered Species Act review<\/em>,\u00a0initiated by EPA only after a lawsuit from health and environmental groups<\/a>, the triazine chemicals were found to adversely affect a range of species. Propazine was found to harm 64 endangered species, while simazine and atrazine were both likely to harm\u00a0over 50% of all endangered species and 40% of their critical habitats<\/a>. EPA\u00a0finds<\/a>, \u201caquatic plant communities are impacted in many areas where atrazine use is heaviest, and there is\u00a0potential chronic risk to fish, amphibians, and aquatic invertebrates.\u201d In addition,\u00a0evidence<\/a>\u00a0shows<\/a>\u00a0that subsequent life stages or generations of fish are at greater risk of reproductive dysfunction after embryonic\/early life exposure to atrazine.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

The triazine class of chemicals also poses significant threats to human health and is particularly concerning in the context of the range of chemicals one may be exposed to in today’s world. As Tyrone Hayes, PhD, University of California, Berkeley professor, noted at a presentation at\u00a0Beyond Pesticides’ National Pesticide Forum<\/a>, \u201cChildren in utero may be exposed to over 300 synthetic chemicals before they leave the womb\u2026 I would argue that a human fetus trapped in contaminated amniotic fluid is no different than one of my tadpoles trapped in a contaminated pond.\u201d \u202f\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

Atrazine has been linked to a range of\u00a0adverse birth outcomes<\/a>, including smaller body sizes, slower growth rates, and certain deformities like\u00a0choanal atresia<\/a>\u00a0(where nasal passages are blocked at birth), and\u00a0hypospadias<\/a>\u00a0(where the opening of a male’s urethra is not located at the tip of the penis). The mechanism of toxicity is perturbation of the neuroendocrine system by disrupting hypothalamic regulation of the pituitary, leading primarily to a disturbance in the ovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone (LH), which results in both reproductive and developmental alterations. Of the numerous adverse effects associated with this disruption, the two that appear to be the most sensitive and occur after the shortest duration (4 days) of exposure are the disruption of the ovarian cycles and the delays in puberty onset.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

Despite these endocrine-disrupting effects, EPA reduces the margin of safety and underestimates exposure to children.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

>> EPA must apply the standard of the Dacthal decision to atrazine and issue an emergency suspension and prohibit use of existing stocks.<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

Mitigation measures have not eliminated the harm.\u00a0<\/strong>
\r\nIn November 2020, Beyond Pesticides and allied environmental groups\u00a0launched a lawsuit<\/a>\u00a0against EPA for its intent to reregister the triazine family of chemicals. The agency’s interim approval of the herbicides, conducted under the Trump administration, eliminates important safeguards for children’s health and a monitoring program intended to protect groundwater from contamination. As is typical with EPA, the agency merely proposed minor label changes in attempts to mitigate risks identified in its registration review.\u00a0According to a release from EPA<\/a>, it made the decision not out of concerns relating to human health and environmental protection, but in order to provide \u201cregulatory certainty\u201d for farmers and local officials.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

Although a hefty 200,000 lbs. of propazine were used each year, mainly on sorghum in Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas, this amount pales in comparison to the over 70 million lbs. of atrazine used throughout the United States. Under an\u00a0Endangered Species Act<\/em>\u00a0review,\u00a0initiated by EPA only after a lawsuit from health and environmental groups<\/a>, the triazine chemicals were found adversely affect a range of species. Propazine was found to harm 64 endangered species, while simazine and atrazine were both likely to harm\u00a0over 50% of all endangered species and 40% of their critical habitats<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

The public does not benefit from continued registration of atrazine.<\/strong>\u00a0
\r\nWhile industry consistently lines up local Congressmembers, former EPA officials, and agrichemical lobbyists to pressure EPA to keep triazines in the market, there is no evidence that the herbicides benefit the farmers these officials claim to represent. According to research published in the\u00a0International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health<\/em>,\u00a0banning atrazine would\u202fprovide an economic benefit to farmers.<\/a>\u00a0\u201cThe winners,\u201d the research concludes, \u201cin an atrazine free future would include farm workers, farmers and their families, and others who are exposed to atrazine either directly from field uses or indirectly from contaminated tap water along with natural ecosystem that are currently damaged by atrazine.\u201d\u202f\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

EPA has sufficient information to cancel atrazine.<\/strong>\u00a0
\r\nEPA has long known about\u00a0triazine’s threats to wildlife<\/a>, including its ability to\u00a0chemically castrate male frogs<\/a>. However, the agency has consistently defended the chemical, and sat by while independent researchers like Dr, Hayes, who conducted seminal research on atrazine’s endocrine disrupting properties, are pilloried by chemical industry propaganda. In a Critical Perspectives piece\u00a0published<\/a>\u00a0in\u00a0Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry<\/em>, Jason Rohr, PhD, provides an in-depth investigation of the atrazine controversy.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

\u201cI argue that the atrazine controversy must be more than just a true story of cover-ups, bias, and vengeance,\u201d he writes in the piece. \u201cIt must be used as an example of how manufacturing uncertainty and bending science can be exploited to delay undesired regulatory decisions and how greed and conflicts of interest\u2014situations where personal or organizational considerations have compromised or biased professional judgment and objectivity\u2014can affect environmental and public health and erode trust in the discipline of toxicology, science in general, and the honorable functioning of societies.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

The\u00a0Draft Ecological Risk Assessments for the Registration Review of Atrazine, Simazine, and Propazine<\/a>, dated October 5, 2016, found high risks that were supported by EPA’s assessments. EPA states, \u201cBased on the results from hundreds of toxicity studies on the effects of atrazine on plants and animals, over 20 years of surface water monitoring data, and higher tier aquatic exposure models, this risk assessment concludes that aquatic plant communities are impacted in many areas where atrazine use is heaviest, and there is potential chronic risk to fish, amphibians, and aquatic invertebrates in these same locations. In the terrestrial environment, there are risk concerns for mammals, birds, reptiles, plants and plant communities across the country for many of the atrazine uses. EPA levels of concern for chronic risk are exceeded by as much as 22, 198, and 62 times for birds, mammals, and fish, respectively. For aquatic phase [stage] amphibians, a weight of evidence analysis concluded there is potential for chronic risks to amphibians based on multiple effects endpoint concentrations compared to measured and predicted surface water concentrations. The breadth of terrestrial plant species and families potentially impacted by atrazine use at current labeled rates, as well as reduced rates of 0.5 and 0.25 lbs. a.i.\/A, suggest that terrestrial plant biodiversity and communities are likely to be impacted from off-field exposures via runoff and spray drift. Average atrazine concentrations in water at or above 5 \u03bcg\/L for several weeks are predicted to lead to reproductive effects in fish, while a 60-day average of 3.4 \u03bcg\/L has a high probability of impacting aquatic plant community primary productivity, structure and function.\u201d<\/p>\r\n

The agency acknowledges many risks of concern associated with the uses of atrazine, but asserts the serious worker and ecological risks remaining after adoption of all proposed mitigation measures are outweighed by the benefits of atrazine use. EPA has determined that the chlorotriazines (triazines) and their three chlorinated metabolites share a common mechanism of toxicity, and as such, human health risks were assessed together through a triazine cumulative risk assessment. The mechanism of toxicity is perturbation of the neuroendocrine system by disrupting hypothalamic regulation of the pituitary, leading primarily to a disturbance in the ovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone (LH), which results in both reproductive and developmental alterations. Of the numerous adverse effects associated with this disruption, the two that appear to be the most sensitive and occur after the shortest duration (4 days) of exposure are the disruption of the ovarian cycles and the delays in puberty onset. Importantly, this perturbation manifests after a short duration exposure with long-term life-cycle consequences, so it establishes both acute and chronic toxicity levels of concern (LOCs).\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

Toxicity and exposure data available to EPA are sufficient to demonstrate that several atrazine uses exceed risk levels of concern. Exposures to children 1-2 years old playing on turf sprayed with atrazine exceed a risk estimate of concern for combined dermal and incidental oral exposures when assuming the maximum labeled rate for spray applications (2.0 lb ai\/A). However, a screening aggregate assessment without the FQPA required safety factor was performed assuming that the application rate for turf is reduced to 1.0 lb ai\/A, which would not be of concern for 4-day aggregate exposures. Even with this rate reduction, it can be presumed children are still at serious risk. For occupational handlers, EPA identified use scenarios that exceed risk concerns even with the maximum available personal protective equipment and\/or engineering controls (proposed mitigation measures).\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

Here is how EPA describes its truncated process for DCPA:\u00a0
\r\n<\/strong>In 2013, the agency issued a Data Call-In (DCI) to AMVAC Chemical Corporation, the sole manufacturer of DCPA, requiring it to submit more than 20 studies to support the existing registrations of DCPA. The required data included a comprehensive study of the effects of DCPA on thyroid development and function in adults and in developing young before and after birth, which was due by January 2016. Several of the studies that AMVAC submitted from 2013-2021 were considered insufficient to address the DCI, while the thyroid study and other studies were not submitted at all.<\/p>\r\n

In\u202fApril 2022<\/a>, EPA issued a very rarely used Notice of Intent to Suspend the DCPA technical-grade product (used to manufacture end-use products) based on AMVAC’s failure to submit the complete set of required data for almost 10 years, including the thyroid study. While AMVAC submitted the required thyroid study in August 2022, EPA suspended the registration based solely on AMVAC’s continued failure to submit other outstanding data on Aug. 22, 2023, following an administrative hearing.\u202f\u00a0In November 2023, the data submission suspension was lifted after AMVAC submitted sufficient data. Most DCPA use on\u202fturf was voluntarily canceled<\/a>\u00a0by AMVAC in December 2023, but unacceptable risks from other uses remained.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

As society and the global community struggle with petrochemical pesticides and their contribution to health threats, biodiversity collapse, and the climate emergency, EPA must acknowledge that Dacthal is one active ingredient among over 1,000 in 56,000 pesticide products whose uses can be eliminated by the use of organic systems that have now been shown to be effective.\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\r\n

*** For more information on the dangers of atrazine and its chemical cousins, read\u00a0Beyond Pesticides’ comments to EPA,<\/a>\u00a0and watch Dr. Tyrone Hayes’ presentations from\u00a0former National Pesticide Forum events on YouTube<\/a>.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\r\n

>> EPA must apply the standard of the Dacthal decision to atrazine and issue an emergency suspension and prohibit use of existing stocks<\/a>.<\/em><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\r\n

Letter to EPA Administrator Michael Regan
\r\n<\/strong>I am pleased to see EPA\u2019s action to ban Dacthal and prohibit the use of existing stocks. The weed killer atrazine fits the criteria used to ban Dacthal and it too should be banned immediately.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

In deciding to ban Dacthal, EPA says it considered the seriousness, immediacy, and likelihood of the threatened harm; benefits to the public of continued use; and nature and extent of the information before EPA.<\/p>\r\n

Atrazine poses immediate serious harms to people and the environment. Under an Endangered Species Act review, the triazines were found to adversely affect many species. Atrazine is likely to harm over 50% of all endangered species and 40% of their critical habitats. EPA finds impacts on aquatic and terrestrial ecology. Evidence shows that subsequent life stages or generations of fish are at greater risk of reproductive dysfunction after embryonic\/early life exposure to atrazine.<\/p>\r\n

Atrazine also poses significant threats to human health. It has been linked to a range of adverse birth outcomes, including smaller body sizes, slower growth rates, and certain deformities like choanal atresia and hypospadias. The mechanism of toxicity\u2014perturbation of the neuroendocrine system\u2014results in reproductive and developmental alterations.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

Mitigation measures have not eliminated harm. In typical fashion, EPA proposed minor label changes to mitigate risks identified in its registration review, deciding not out of concerns relating to human health and environmental protection, but to provide \u201cregulatory certainty\u201d for farmers and local officials. Environmental and health harms continue.<\/p>\r\n

The public does not benefit from continued use of atrazine. There is no evidence that atrazine benefits farmers. According to research published in the International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health<\/em>, banning atrazine would\u202feconomically benefit farmers. Claims that losing atrazine will lead to reduced corn yields and increased prices have been refuted by these researchers. Because much of the corn grown in the U.S. is intended for ethanol producers and livestock feed, corn prices are heavily determined by the demand from these two sectors, compared to production costs.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

Significantly, EPA routinely refuses to recognize the success of organic farming, which does not depend on synthetic pesticides, in calculating \u201cbenefits.\u201d<\/p>\r\n

EPA has sufficient information to ban atrazine.<\/strong>
\r\nEPA has long known about atrazine\u2019s threats to wildlife, including its ability to chemically castrate male frogs. EPA\u2019s ecological risk assessment found high risks: \u201cBased on the results from hundreds of toxicity studies on the effects of atrazine on plants and animals, over 20 years of surface water monitoring data, and higher tier aquatic exposure models, this risk assessment concludes that aquatic plant communities are impacted in many areas where atrazine use is heaviest, and there is potential chronic risk to fish, amphibians, and aquatic invertebrates. . . The breadth of terrestrial plant species and families potentially impacted by atrazine use at current labeled rates, as well as reduced rates of 0.5 and 0.25 lbs. a.i.\/A, suggest that terrestrial plant biodiversity and communities are likely to be impacted from off-field exposures via runoff and spray drift.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

EPA has determined that the triazines and their chlorinated metabolites share a common mechanism of toxicity\u2014perturbation of the neuroendocrine system by disrupting hypothalamic regulation of the pituitary\u2014leading to a disturbance in the ovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone, resulting in reproductive and developmental alterations. These risks exceed levels of concern, including children and workers.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

Please apply the standard of the Dacthal decision to atrazine. Issue an emergency suspension and prohibit use of existing stocks.<\/p>\r\n

Thank you.<\/p>\r\n

Letter to U.S. Representative and Senators
\r\n<\/strong>I am pleased to see EPA\u2019s action to ban Dacthal and prohibit the use of existing stocks.\u00a0 The weed killer atrazine fits the criteria used to ban Dacthal and it too should be banned immediately.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

In deciding to ban Dacthal, EPA says it considered the seriousness, immediacy, and likelihood of the threatened harm; benefits to the public of continued use; and nature and extent of the information before EPA.<\/p>\r\n

Atrazine poses immediate serious harms to people and the environment. Under an Endangered Species Act review, the triazines were found to adversely affect many species. Atrazine is likely to harm over 50% of all endangered species and 40% of their critical habitats. EPA finds impacts on aquatic and terrestrial ecology. Evidence shows that subsequent life stages or generations of fish are at greater risk of reproductive dysfunction after embryonic\/early life exposure to atrazine.<\/p>\r\n

Atrazine also poses significant threats to human health. It has been linked to a range of adverse birth outcomes, including smaller body sizes, slower growth rates, and certain deformities like choanal atresia and hypospadias. The mechanism of toxicity\u2014perturbation of the neuroendocrine system\u2014results in reproductive and developmental alterations.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

Mitigation measures have not eliminated harm. In typical fashion, EPA proposed minor label changes to mitigate risks identified in its registration review, deciding not out of concerns relating to human health and environmental protection, but to provide \u201cregulatory certainty\u201d for farmers and local officials. Environmental and health harms continue.<\/p>\r\n

The public does not benefit from continued use of atrazine. There is no evidence that atrazine benefits farmers. According to research published in the International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, banning atrazine would\u202feconomically benefit farmers. Claims that losing atrazine will lead to reduced corn yields and increased prices have been refuted by these researchers. Because much of the corn grown in the U.S. is intended for ethanol producers and livestock feed, corn prices are heavily determined by the demand from these two sectors, compared to production costs.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

Significantly, EPA routinely refuses to recognize the success of organic farming, which does not depend on synthetic pesticides, in calculating \u201cbenefits.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

EPA has sufficient information to ban atrazine. EPA has long known about atrazine\u2019s threats to wildlife, including its ability to chemically castrate male frogs. EPA\u2019s ecological risk assessment found high risks: \u201cBased on the results from hundreds of toxicity studies on the effects of atrazine on plants and animals, over 20 years of surface water monitoring data, and higher tier aquatic exposure models, this risk assessment concludes that aquatic plant communities are impacted in many areas where atrazine use is heaviest, and there is potential chronic risk to fish, amphibians, and aquatic invertebrates. \u2026 The breadth of terrestrial plant species and families potentially impacted by atrazine use at current labeled rates, as well as reduced rates of 0.5 and 0.25 lbs. a.i.\/A, suggest that terrestrial plant biodiversity and communities are likely to be impacted from off-field exposures via runoff and spray drift.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

EPA has determined that the triazines and their chlorinated metabolites share a common mechanism of toxicity\u2014perturbation of the neuroendocrine system by disrupting hypothalamic regulation of the pituitary\u2014leading to a disturbance in the ovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone, resulting in reproductive and developmental alterations. Data available to EPA demonstrate that several atrazine uses exceed risk levels of concern, including children and workers.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

Tell EPA to apply the standard of the Dacthal decision consistently\u2014to ban atrazine.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n

Thank you.<\/p>\r\n

 <\/p>\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

(Beyond Pesticides, August 26, 2024)\u00a0In July, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced it was raising the allowable levels of the highly toxic weed killer atrazine in the nation\u2019s waterways from the 2016 level of 3.4 to 9.7 micrograms per liter (\u00b5g\/L), which scientists and environmental advocates say is a serious threat to aquatic plants, fish, invertebrates, and amphibians, in addition to people who recreate in waterways or eat food from them. With EPA\u2019s August 7 decision to ban the weed killer Dacthal (or DCPA–dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate), Beyond Pesticides is rallying public support for the removal of atrazine from the market under the same standards of harm, inability to mitigate hazards, and the availability of alternatives. As Beyond Pesticides points out in its 2022 atrazine comments (2020 and 2016 comments included) to EPA, the agency in November 2021 released the final Biological Evaluation (BE) assessing risks to listed species from labeled uses of atrazine (in the triazine chemical family). The agency made \u201clikely to adversely affect (LAA) determinations\u201d for 1,013 species and 328 critical habitats, which it is now rejecting, while using a \u201ccommunity-equivalent level of concern (CE-LOC)\u201d measure that is filled with uncertainty and lacks any sense of precaution with […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":36262,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[249,2,72,186,354,494,7,166,276,1],"tags":[1366,1546,1547,1222,1793,766,688,605,1371,784,1605,643,1552,1176,600,786,976,1829,852,1548],"class_list":["post-36249","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-agriculture","category-alternativesorganics","category-atrazine","category-dacthal","category-environmental-protection-agency-epa","category-herbicides","category-lawnslandscapes","category-syngenta","category-take-action","category-uncategorized","tag-atrazine","tag-dacthal","tag-dcpa","tag-ecosystem","tag-emergency","tag-environment","tag-environmental-protection-agency","tag-epa","tag-existing-stock","tag-fifra","tag-fqpa","tag-health","tag-imminent-hazard-authority","tag-pesticide-regulation","tag-pesticides","tag-take-action","tag-toxic","tag-triazine","tag-waterways","tag-weedkiller"],"yoast_head":"\nBeyond Pesticides Rallies Public to Ban Weed Killer Atrazine with Standard EPA Used Earlier to Ban Dacthal - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"With EPA\u2019s August 7 decision to ban the weed killer Dacthal (or DCPA--dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate), Beyond Pesticides is rallying public support for the removal of atrazine from the market under the same standards of harm, inability to mitigate hazards, and the availability of alternatives.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Beyond Pesticides Rallies Public to Ban Weed Killer Atrazine with Standard EPA Used Earlier to Ban Dacthal - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"With EPA\u2019s August 7 decision to ban the weed killer Dacthal (or DCPA--dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate), Beyond Pesticides is rallying public support for the removal of atrazine from the market under the same standards of harm, inability to mitigate hazards, and the availability of alternatives.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-26T04:01:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-26T21:29:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/aerial.sprayingcropduster.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Beyond Pesticides\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ByondPesticides\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ByondPesticides\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Beyond Pesticides\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"18 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Beyond Pesticides\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5c0a0981b549cc5b628770073031f4\"},\"headline\":\"Beyond Pesticides Rallies Public to Ban Weed Killer Atrazine with Standard EPA Used Earlier to Ban Dacthal\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-26T04:01:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-26T21:29:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/\"},\"wordCount\":4013,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/aerial.sprayingcropduster.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"atrazine\",\"dacthal\",\"DCPA\",\"ecosystem\",\"emergency\",\"environment\",\"Environmental Protection Agency\",\"EPA\",\"existing stock\",\"FIFRA\",\"FQPA\",\"health\",\"imminent hazard authority\",\"pesticide regulation\",\"pesticides\",\"take action\",\"toxic\",\"triazine\",\"waterways\",\"weedkiller\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Agriculture\",\"Alternatives\/Organics\",\"Atrazine\",\"dacthal\",\"Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)\",\"Herbicides\",\"Lawns\/Landscapes\",\"Syngenta\",\"Take Action\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/\",\"name\":\"Beyond Pesticides Rallies Public to Ban Weed Killer Atrazine with Standard EPA Used Earlier to Ban Dacthal - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/aerial.sprayingcropduster.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-26T04:01:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-26T21:29:40+00:00\",\"description\":\"With EPA\u2019s August 7 decision to ban the weed killer Dacthal (or DCPA--dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate), Beyond Pesticides is rallying public support for the removal of atrazine from the market under the same standards of harm, inability to mitigate hazards, and the availability of alternatives.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/aerial.sprayingcropduster.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/aerial.sprayingcropduster.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Beyond Pesticides Rallies Public to Ban Weed Killer Atrazine with Standard EPA Used Earlier to Ban Dacthal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/\",\"name\":\"Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog\",\"description\":\"News on Pesticide Science, Policy and Activism\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Beyond Pesticides\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/BeyondPesticides-Logo-Stacked-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/BeyondPesticides-Logo-Stacked-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":2501,\"caption\":\"Beyond Pesticides\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/ByondPesticides\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/beyondpesticides\/?hl=en\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/beyond-pesticides\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/bpncamp\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5c0a0981b549cc5b628770073031f4\",\"name\":\"Beyond Pesticides\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e26b7558fcb265e244c6e159abe5f0aab551822dc82fd0b1607e809bdfbed20a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e26b7558fcb265e244c6e159abe5f0aab551822dc82fd0b1607e809bdfbed20a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Beyond Pesticides\"},\"description\":\"Beyond Pesticides is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C., which works with allies in protecting public health and the environment to lead the transition to a world free of toxic pesticides. The founders, who established Beyond Pesticides (originally as National Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides) as a nonprofit membership organization in 1981, felt that without the existence of such an organized, national network, local, state and national pesticide policy would become, under chemical industry pressure, increasingly unresponsive to public health and environmental concerns. Beyond Pesticides believes that people must have a voice in decisions that affect them directly. We believe decisions should not be made for us by chemical companies or by decision-makers who either do not have all of the facts or refuse to consider them. Learn more about our work, read A Year in Review\u20142021, our accomplishments are your victories! Beyond Pesticides seeks to protect healthy air, water, land, and food for ourselves and future generations. By forging ties with governments, nonprofits, and people who rely on these natural resources, we reduce the need for unnecessary pesticide use and protect public health and the environment. Beyond Pesticides provides hands-on services to the public and supports local action by: identifying and interpreting hazards; and, designing safe pest management programs. With the information provided by Beyond Pesticides, people may not only be able to make informed choices and adopt practices that protect themselves and their families from unnecessary exposure to pesticides, but they will be able to effect changes on community-wide pest management decisions and policies that govern pesticide use, such as pesticide uses in parks, schools, for community insect control and along roadsides. Beyond Pesticides believes that people must have a voice in decisions which affect them directly.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\/\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/beyondpesticides\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/beyond-pesticides\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/ByondPesticides\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/bpncamp\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/author\/beyond-pesticides\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Beyond Pesticides Rallies Public to Ban Weed Killer Atrazine with Standard EPA Used Earlier to Ban Dacthal - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","description":"With EPA\u2019s August 7 decision to ban the weed killer Dacthal (or DCPA--dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate), Beyond Pesticides is rallying public support for the removal of atrazine from the market under the same standards of harm, inability to mitigate hazards, and the availability of alternatives.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Beyond Pesticides Rallies Public to Ban Weed Killer Atrazine with Standard EPA Used Earlier to Ban Dacthal - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","og_description":"With EPA\u2019s August 7 decision to ban the weed killer Dacthal (or DCPA--dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate), Beyond Pesticides is rallying public support for the removal of atrazine from the market under the same standards of harm, inability to mitigate hazards, and the availability of alternatives.","og_url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/","og_site_name":"Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\/","article_published_time":"2024-08-26T04:01:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-26T21:29:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/aerial.sprayingcropduster.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Beyond Pesticides","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ByondPesticides","twitter_site":"@ByondPesticides","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Beyond Pesticides","Est. reading time":"18 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/"},"author":{"name":"Beyond Pesticides","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5c0a0981b549cc5b628770073031f4"},"headline":"Beyond Pesticides Rallies Public to Ban Weed Killer Atrazine with Standard EPA Used Earlier to Ban Dacthal","datePublished":"2024-08-26T04:01:20+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-26T21:29:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/"},"wordCount":4013,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/aerial.sprayingcropduster.jpg","keywords":["atrazine","dacthal","DCPA","ecosystem","emergency","environment","Environmental Protection Agency","EPA","existing stock","FIFRA","FQPA","health","imminent hazard authority","pesticide regulation","pesticides","take action","toxic","triazine","waterways","weedkiller"],"articleSection":["Agriculture","Alternatives\/Organics","Atrazine","dacthal","Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)","Herbicides","Lawns\/Landscapes","Syngenta","Take Action"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/","name":"Beyond Pesticides Rallies Public to Ban Weed Killer Atrazine with Standard EPA Used Earlier to Ban Dacthal - Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/aerial.sprayingcropduster.jpg","datePublished":"2024-08-26T04:01:20+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-26T21:29:40+00:00","description":"With EPA\u2019s August 7 decision to ban the weed killer Dacthal (or DCPA--dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate), Beyond Pesticides is rallying public support for the removal of atrazine from the market under the same standards of harm, inability to mitigate hazards, and the availability of alternatives.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/aerial.sprayingcropduster.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/aerial.sprayingcropduster.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/2024\/08\/beyond-pesticides-rallies-public-to-ban-weed-killer-atrazine-with-standard-epa-used-earlier-to-ban-dacthal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Beyond Pesticides Rallies Public to Ban Weed Killer Atrazine with Standard EPA Used Earlier to Ban Dacthal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/","name":"Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog","description":"News on Pesticide Science, Policy and Activism","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#organization","name":"Beyond Pesticides","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/BeyondPesticides-Logo-Stacked-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/BeyondPesticides-Logo-Stacked-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":2501,"caption":"Beyond Pesticides"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides","https:\/\/x.com\/ByondPesticides","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/beyondpesticides\/?hl=en","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/beyond-pesticides","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/bpncamp"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/1b5c0a0981b549cc5b628770073031f4","name":"Beyond Pesticides","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e26b7558fcb265e244c6e159abe5f0aab551822dc82fd0b1607e809bdfbed20a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e26b7558fcb265e244c6e159abe5f0aab551822dc82fd0b1607e809bdfbed20a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Beyond Pesticides"},"description":"Beyond Pesticides is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C., which works with allies in protecting public health and the environment to lead the transition to a world free of toxic pesticides. The founders, who established Beyond Pesticides (originally as National Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides) as a nonprofit membership organization in 1981, felt that without the existence of such an organized, national network, local, state and national pesticide policy would become, under chemical industry pressure, increasingly unresponsive to public health and environmental concerns. Beyond Pesticides believes that people must have a voice in decisions that affect them directly. We believe decisions should not be made for us by chemical companies or by decision-makers who either do not have all of the facts or refuse to consider them. Learn more about our work, read A Year in Review\u20142021, our accomplishments are your victories! Beyond Pesticides seeks to protect healthy air, water, land, and food for ourselves and future generations. By forging ties with governments, nonprofits, and people who rely on these natural resources, we reduce the need for unnecessary pesticide use and protect public health and the environment. Beyond Pesticides provides hands-on services to the public and supports local action by: identifying and interpreting hazards; and, designing safe pest management programs. With the information provided by Beyond Pesticides, people may not only be able to make informed choices and adopt practices that protect themselves and their families from unnecessary exposure to pesticides, but they will be able to effect changes on community-wide pest management decisions and policies that govern pesticide use, such as pesticide uses in parks, schools, for community insect control and along roadsides. Beyond Pesticides believes that people must have a voice in decisions which affect them directly.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.beyondpesticides.org","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/beyondpesticides\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/beyondpesticides\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/beyond-pesticides\/","https:\/\/x.com\/ByondPesticides","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/bpncamp\/"],"url":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/author\/beyond-pesticides\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36249","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36249"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36249\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":36281,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36249\/revisions\/36281"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/36262"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36249"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36249"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beyondpesticides.org\/dailynewsblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36249"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}