Nanosilver:
Regulatory Issues
New:
The comment period on the petition filed by the International Center
for Technology Assessment (ICTA) et al. requesting that EPA regulate nanoscale
silver as a pesticide has been extend for 60 days to March 20, 2009. To
submit comments in support click here.
All pesticidal substances
must be registered with the EPA in accordance with the Federal Insecticide
Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Under FIFRA, silver nanoparticles
meet the definition of a pesticide- that is, as a substance that is intended
to disinfect, sanitize, reduce, or mitigate growth or development of microbiological
organisms. As such, silver nanoparticles, with their antimicrobial activity,
should and must be regulated by the EPA as a pesticide. However, despite
over 200 products being sold on the consumer marketplace, the EPA has
done little to regulate or evaluate the potential health and environmental
impacts these particles may cause.
There have been a
few examples of regulatory action taken by the EPA against manufacturers
whose products contained silver nanoparticles, including action against
the manufacturer of a washing machine generating silver nanoparticles.
In early 2008, the EPA imposed a landmark fine of over $200,000 on a California
company selling computer keyboards and other parts coated with nanosilver
without being registered.
In 2008, the International
Center for Technology Assessment (ICTA), and a coalition of consumer,
health, and environmental groups, including Beyond Pesticides, filed a
petition with the EPA challenging the agency’s failure to regulate
nanomaterials. This petition followed a joint report entitled “Principles
for the Oversight of Nanotechnologies and Nanomaterials,” released
in 2007 by a broad international coalition of consumer, public health,
environmental, and labor organizations calling for strong, comprehensive
oversight of the new technology and its products, citing risks to the
public, workers and the environment. EPA has since opened a public comment
period in response to a petition filed, after which the EPA will review
the petition and any comments received before responding to the petition.
To view the petition click here
Did
You Know?...
FDA, EPA and over 20 other federal agencies are part of the
National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI), a federal research and development
program established to coordinate the multi-agency efforts in nanoscale
science, engineering, and technology. Many of these participating
agencies, including Department of Defense and the National Science
Foundation, have R&D budgets that relate to nanotechnology, with
approximately $1.5billion representing the collective sum. The NNI
as a program does not fund research; however, it informs and influences
the federal budget and planning processes through its member agencies.
For more about NNI visit www.nano.gov
|
Cosmetics, sunscreens
and other consumer products used in or on the body that contain silver
nanoparticles fall under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Federal Drug Administration
(FDA). The FDA has not established its own formal definition of nanotechnology
or nanomaterials. However, an FDA Nanotechnology Task Force, states in
a 2007 report, “ [nanoscale] materials present challenges similar
to those posed by products using other emerging technologies. The challenges,
however, may be complicated by the fact that properties
relevant to product
safety and effectiveness may change as size varies within the nanoscale.”
The report goes on to state, “the emerging and uncertain nature
of nanotechnology and the potentially rapid development of applications
for FDA-regulated products highlight the need for ensuring transparent,
consistent, and predictable
regulatory pathways.” It remains unclear, however, whether the FDA
has put mechanisms in place to address these challenges to regulate nanomaterials
in order to protect human health.
The U.S. federal government
has invested only a small percentage of its overall nanotechnology research
funding in understanding the risks posed by nanomaterials. However, the
widespread use of silver nano products will challenge regulatory agencies
to balance important potential benefits against the possibility of significant
human health and environmental risk.
Resources: