(By Diane Baxter, from June 1986 Pesticides and You)
If you foresee finding yourself in court, because of property damage or possible health effects, you will need to document pesticide exposure.
Not necessarily. Although cause and effect are difficult to establish, testing may detect the presence of the chemical in the physical or biological environment, thus strengthening a case.
Environmental testing--soil, water, air, surface swabs, wood scrapings, carpet samples, etc., and/or
Biological testing--blood, urine, even fat biopsies.
The biological tests required depend on the chemical involved. For example, a blood test can detect acetylcholinesterase enzyme depression caused by organophosphate poisoning. Phenoxy acid residues, however, are measured in the urine. Organochlorines can sometimes be detected in the blood, but 100 to 300 times more may be detected in fat tissue.
The lab should be using validated methods of analysis for the particular pesticide, such as those published in the Pesticide Analytical Manual, in the Association of Official Analytical Chemists Manual, or by EPA. It should have an internal quality assurance program in place to make sure instruments and personnel are performing well. Check samples should be run on positive or borderline positive samples.
In consultation with an independent scientist, either a toxicologist or an analytical chemist, determine how sensitive the method of analysis must be to be useful to you, and then determine whether the lab can perform reliable measurements at that level.
Numerical data should be reported in clearly identifiable units, for example, milligrams per liter, parts-per-million, etc. The laboratory should provide you with information about the adequacy of the method chosen for analysis, including percent recovery of spiked samples, results of a standard curve, and results of assay blanks.