[X] CLOSEMAIN MENU

  • Archives

  • Categories

    • air pollution (8)
    • Announcements (611)
    • Antibiotic Resistance (47)
    • Antimicrobial (22)
    • Aquaculture (31)
    • Aquatic Organisms (43)
    • Artificial Intelligence (1)
    • Bats (18)
    • Beneficials (70)
    • biofertilizers (2)
    • Biofuels (6)
    • Biological Control (36)
    • Biomonitoring (40)
    • Biostimulants (1)
    • Birds (29)
    • btomsfiolone (1)
    • Bug Bombs (2)
    • Cannabis (31)
    • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (13)
    • Chemical Mixtures (18)
    • Children (137)
    • Children/Schools (243)
    • cicadas (1)
    • Climate (44)
    • Climate Change (108)
    • Clover (1)
    • compost (8)
    • Congress (27)
    • contamination (166)
    • deethylatrazine (1)
    • diamides (1)
    • Disinfectants & Sanitizers (19)
    • Drift (21)
    • Drinking Water (21)
    • Ecosystem Services (36)
    • Emergency Exemption (3)
    • Environmental Justice (182)
    • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (602)
    • Events (91)
    • Farm Bill (27)
    • Farmworkers (216)
    • Forestry (6)
    • Fracking (4)
    • Fungal Resistance (8)
    • Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) (1)
    • Goats (2)
    • Golf (15)
    • Greenhouse (1)
    • Groundwater (18)
    • Health care (32)
    • Herbicides (56)
    • Holidays (44)
    • Household Use (9)
    • Indigenous People (8)
    • Indoor Air Quality (7)
    • Infectious Disease (4)
    • Integrated and Organic Pest Management (80)
    • Invasive Species (35)
    • Label Claims (51)
    • Lawns/Landscapes (257)
    • Litigation (355)
    • Livestock (13)
    • men’s health (9)
    • metabolic syndrome (3)
    • Metabolites (11)
    • Mexico (1)
    • Microbiata (26)
    • Microbiome (37)
    • molluscicide (1)
    • Nanosilver (2)
    • Nanotechnology (54)
    • National Politics (389)
    • Native Americans (4)
    • Occupational Health (20)
    • Oceans (12)
    • Office of Inspector General (5)
    • perennial crops (1)
    • Pesticide Drift (171)
    • Pesticide Efficacy (13)
    • Pesticide Mixtures (23)
    • Pesticide Residues (200)
    • Pets (37)
    • Plant Incorporated Protectants (3)
    • Plastic (13)
    • Poisoning (22)
    • President-elect Transition (3)
    • Reflection (3)
    • Repellent (4)
    • Resistance (128)
    • Rights-of-Way (1)
    • Rodenticide (36)
    • Seasonal (5)
    • Seeds (8)
    • soil health (42)
    • Superfund (5)
    • synergistic effects (33)
    • Synthetic Pyrethroids (18)
    • Synthetic Turf (3)
    • Take Action (628)
    • Textile/Apparel/Fashion Industry (1)
    • Toxic Waste (12)
    • U.S. Supreme Court (5)
    • Volatile Organic Compounds (1)
    • Women’s Health (37)
    • Wood Preservatives (36)
    • World Health Organization (12)
    • Year in Review (3)
  • Most Viewed Posts

Daily News Blog

Archive for the 'NOSB National Organic Standards Board' Category


09
Apr

Industry Stops PFAS Restrictions, Reverses EPA in Court, as Plastic Leaches Contaminants

(Beyond Pesticides, April 9, 2024) The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in an opinion authored by Circuit Judge Cory T. Wilson, has vacated an action by the U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency (EPA) that had ordered the Texas-based manufacturer Inhance Technologies, L.L.C. to stop producing plastic containers that leach toxic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) into pesticides, household cleaners, condiments, and additional products. EPA has taken action after the agency determined that the PFAS created during the fluorination process “are highly toxic and present unreasonable risks that cannot be prevented other than through prohibition of manufacture.” While the court is not challenging EPA’s authority to determine the hazards associated with PFAS exposure to be unacceptable, on a technicality, it is finding that the agency used the wrong section of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), Section 5, which the court says is focused on new uses. According to the Court, “The EPA is just not allowed to skirt the framework set by Congress by arbitrarily deeming Inhance’s decades-old fluorination process a “significant new use,” even though EPA’s awareness of the PFAS contamination was “new” to the agency and not disclosed by the manufacturer. Even if EPA were […]

Share