[X] CLOSEMAIN MENU

  • Archives

  • Categories

    • air pollution (11)
    • Announcements (620)
    • Antibiotic Resistance (51)
    • Antimicrobial (25)
    • Aquaculture (32)
    • Aquatic Organisms (51)
    • Artificial Intelligence (1)
    • Bats (23)
    • Beneficials (88)
    • biofertilizers (2)
    • Biofuels (6)
    • Biological Control (38)
    • Biomonitoring (52)
    • Biostimulants (1)
    • Birds (35)
    • btomsfiolone (1)
    • Bug Bombs (2)
    • Cannabis (31)
    • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (16)
    • Chemical Mixtures (28)
    • Children (158)
    • Children/Schools (251)
    • cicadas (1)
    • Climate (52)
    • Climate Change (116)
    • Clouds (1)
    • Clover (1)
    • compost (9)
    • Congress (38)
    • contamination (179)
    • deethylatrazine (2)
    • diamides (1)
    • Disinfectants & Sanitizers (19)
    • Drift (32)
    • Drinking Water (25)
    • Ecosystem Services (53)
    • Emergency Exemption (3)
    • Environmental Justice (196)
    • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (641)
    • Events (97)
    • Farm Bill (31)
    • Farmworkers (233)
    • Forestry (6)
    • Fracking (4)
    • Fungal Resistance (8)
    • Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) (1)
    • Goats (3)
    • Golf (16)
    • Greenhouse (1)
    • Groundwater (24)
    • Health care (34)
    • Herbicides (70)
    • Holidays (54)
    • Household Use (10)
    • Indigenous People (14)
    • Indoor Air Quality (8)
    • Infectious Disease (4)
    • Insecticides (6)
    • Integrated and Organic Pest Management (81)
    • Invasive Species (37)
    • Label Claims (57)
    • Lawns/Landscapes (262)
    • Litigation (363)
    • Livestock (16)
    • men’s health (10)
    • metabolic syndrome (3)
    • Metabolites (21)
    • Mexico (1)
    • Microbiata (27)
    • Microbiome (46)
    • molluscicide (1)
    • Nanosilver (2)
    • Nanotechnology (54)
    • National Environmental Policy Act (1)
    • National Politics (390)
    • Native Americans (8)
    • Occupational Health (31)
    • Oceans (13)
    • Office of Inspector General (5)
    • perennial crops (1)
    • Pesticide Drift (190)
    • Pesticide Efficacy (13)
    • Pesticide Mixtures (39)
    • Pesticide Residues (210)
    • Pets (40)
    • Plant Incorporated Protectants (3)
    • Plastic (14)
    • Poisoning (24)
    • President-elect Transition (3)
    • rainwater (1)
    • Reflection (7)
    • Repellent (5)
    • Resistance (129)
    • Rights-of-Way (1)
    • Rodenticide (37)
    • Seasonal (7)
    • Seeds (14)
    • soil health (56)
    • Superfund (5)
    • synergistic effects (52)
    • Synthetic Pyrethroids (20)
    • Synthetic Turf (4)
    • Take Action (656)
    • Textile/Apparel/Fashion Industry (1)
    • Toxic Waste (13)
    • U.S. Supreme Court (8)
    • Volatile Organic Compounds (2)
    • Women’s Health (45)
    • Wood Preservatives (36)
    • World Health Organization (14)
    • Year in Review (4)
  • Most Viewed Posts

Search Results

Take Action: Demand EPA and NMFS Protect Endangered Fish from Harmful Pesticides

Tuesday, August 19th, 2008

(Beyond Pesticides, August 19, 2008) Three toxic pesticides used heavily in the United States ”” chlorpyrifos, diazinon, and malathion ”” harm children and farmworkers, poison wildlife, and taint food and drinking water, and despite well-documented hazards, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) allows homeowners, farmers and others to use these poisons in ways that harm salmon and steelhead. Coupled with public pressure, a recent scientific analysis from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) could force EPA to adopt new restrictions on the use of these pesticides in the Pacific Northwest and California. In a draft study — called a “biological opinion” — released on July 31, 2008, NMFS concluded that chlorpyrifos, diazinon, and malathion are contaminating rivers and streams jeopardizing protected salmon and steelhead. Please urge NMFS and EPA to adopt strong measures to protect Pacific salmon from these poisons. It is their responsibility under the Endangered Species Act. Please send an email addressed to both: Jim Lecky Director of Office of Protected Resources, NMFS [email protected] James Gulliford Assistant Administrator, US EPA Headquarters [email protected] You can be sure that chemical companies are working to ensure the unabated use of their products. Make sure the voice of the public is heard. Harmful […]

Share

Fed Report Finds Pesticides Threaten Salmon

Thursday, August 14th, 2008

(Beyond Pesticides, August 14, 2008) The first report released by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) as a result of a lawsuit (NCAP et al. v. NMFS, No. 07-1791 RSL) settlement reveal “overwhelming evidence” to suggest that the pesticides chlorpyrifos, malathion, and diazinon increase the chance of extinction for protected salmon and steelhead. The report on the three pesticides and their effects on threatened fish is the first in what is expected to be a four year review process of 37 pesticides. “These are pesticides that EPA [the Environmental Protection Agency] has swept under the rug for years. These are three that stood out as the nastiest of the (pesticides) that are still in widespread use,” said Joshua Osborne-Klein, an attorney for Earthjustice who represented the plaintiff, Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides (NCAP). The 377-page report is clear in its conclusion that current use patterns of these three toxic pesticides threaten the salmon and steelhead protected by the Endangered Species Act, but it does not delineate the next steps to reduce the risk. A report on mitigation measures, which could include restrictions or bans, is expected in the next few months. The timing of the report coincides with other […]

Share

National Fisheries Agency Agrees to Review Harmful Pesticides

Wednesday, August 6th, 2008

(Beyond Pesticides, August 6, 2008) On July 30, 2008, a coalition of fishing and environmental groups settled a lawsuit (NCAP et al. v. NMFS, No. 07-1791 RSL) that requires an impact analysis of 37 pesticides on protected salmon and steelhead in the Pacific Northwest and California. The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), the federal agency charged with protecting threatened and endangered salmon and steelhead, agreed to the settlement, which requires the design and adoption of permanent measures to help pesticide users minimize the harmful effects of those pesticides. The lawsuit, filed last year in the U.S. District Court in Seattle, petitioned the court to order the NMFS to uphold a five-year-old rule that directs the agency to identify measures needed to protect salmon from the pesticides. The petitioners pointed out that NMFS failed to carry out these measures. (See Daily News Blog of November 7, 2007.) The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determined that the 37 toxic pesticides at issue in the settlement may harm protected salmon and steelhead. Most of the pesticides have been detected in major salmon and steelhead rivers in the Pacific Northwest and California. Scientists have found that, even at low levels, toxic pesticides can harm salmon […]

Share

Public Comments Needed: Fish and Wildlife Service Issues Plan for Mosquito Management in Refuges

Thursday, December 20th, 2007

(Beyond Pesticides, December 20, 2007) Responding to numerous requests from the public for more time to comment, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has opened an additional 60-day public comment period on a draft mosquito management policy until February 17, 2008. The original press release on the proposal, issued on October 15, 2007, and the Federal Register Notice (72 FR 58321-58333) outlines guidance for determining the conditions under which national wildlife refuges will control mosquitoes. Notification of the public comment period was published in the Federal Register December 19, 2007. The Service received 35 comments during the original 45-day comment period, which closed on November 29, 2007. Mosquito Control Districts in several states as well as members of the public asked for more time to respond. The Service currently allows some form of mosquito control by state or local vector control agencies under Special Use Permits on approximately 40 national wildlife refuges, most of them in coastal areas. An interim Director’s Order, issued in May 2005, provided guidance for mosquito management on refuges while a permanent policy was being developed. The draft policy states that the Refuge System will allow populations of native mosquito species to exist unimpeded unless they […]

Share

Lawsuit Filed To Protect Salmon Still at Risk from Pesticides

Wednesday, November 7th, 2007

(Beyond Pesticides, November 7, 2007) A lawsuit was filed in federal court on Monday by fishing and environmental groups seeking to force the federal government to uphold five-year-old rules aimed to keep toxic agricultural pesticides from endangering salmon and steelhead. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court in Seattle, petitions the court to order the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to identify measures needed to protect salmon from the pesticides and to complete required consultations with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The NMFS has failed to carry out these measures first ordered in 2002 by federal court. It was ordered to consult with the EPA to develop permanent methods for protecting salmon and steelhead from 54 toxic pesticides found in west coast salmon streams. Under the federal Endangered Species Act, the NMFS is required to complete such actions within 90 days. “Apparently what it takes to get this administration to do its job under [the Endangered Species Act] is to have someone there enforcing the law every step of the way,” said Joshua Osborne-Klein, an attorney for Earthjustice, the environmental public interest law firm representing the advocates. Pesticides have been detected in every major salmon stream in the Pacific […]

Share

Bald Eagle To Be Removed from Endangered Species List

Friday, June 29th, 2007

(Beyond Pesticides, June 29, 2007) On June 28, 2007, forty years after it received protection under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and thirty-five years after the banning of DDT in the U.S., the bald eagle was removed from the ESA’s “threatened” list. Bald eagle populations declined dramatically in the last century, attributed mostly to the accumulation of the pesticide DDT in fish, a staple of the eagle’s diet. The pesticide gradually poisoned females, causing them to produce thinly-shelled eggs that broke easily, preventing the embryos from growing. Years of hunting, accidental poisoning and habitat loss took an additional toll. “The rescue of the bald eagle from the brink of extinction ranks among the greatest victories of American conservation.” said John Flicker, President of the National Audubon Society. “Like no other species, the bald eagle showed us all that environmental stewardship has priceless rewards. In every state, parents and grandparents can still point to the sky and share a moment of wonder as a bald eagle soars overhead.” The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) in 1967 listed the bald eagle as endangered, a designation that gave the bird legal protection from harmful human activities and in 1972, the U.S. Environmental […]

Share

EPA Sued Over Pesticides Harmful to 11 Bay Area Endangered Species

Wednesday, May 30th, 2007

(Beyond Pesticides, May 30, 2007) The Center for Biological Diversity today filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for violating the Endangered Species Act (ESA). EPA has registered and allowed the use of 60 toxic pesticides in habitats for nearly a dozen San Francisco Bay Area endangered species without determining whether the chemicals jeopardize their existence. “Ending the use of known poisons in habitat for our most endangered wildlife is an appropriate 100th birthday tribute to Rachel Carson, who alerted us to the hazards of exposure to toxic chemicals almost half a century ago,” said Jeff Miller, conservation advocate with the Center. “Unfortunately the EPA has not learned from her legacy and still has no plan to adequately assess impacts while registering and approving pesticide uses that pose a clear and present danger both to imperiled species and human health.” At least 61 million pounds of pesticide active ingredients were applied in Bay Area counties from 1999 through 2005 ”” over 8.5 million pounds annually. Actual pesticide use may have been several times this amount since most home and commercial pesticide use is not reported to the state. Under the Bush administration, EPA has consistently failed to […]

Share