[X] CLOSEMAIN MENU

  • Archives

  • Categories

    • air pollution (11)
    • Announcements (616)
    • Antibiotic Resistance (49)
    • Antimicrobial (24)
    • Aquaculture (32)
    • Aquatic Organisms (50)
    • Artificial Intelligence (1)
    • Bats (19)
    • Beneficials (81)
    • biofertilizers (2)
    • Biofuels (6)
    • Biological Control (37)
    • Biomonitoring (45)
    • Biostimulants (1)
    • Birds (33)
    • btomsfiolone (1)
    • Bug Bombs (2)
    • Cannabis (31)
    • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (14)
    • Chemical Mixtures (24)
    • Children (151)
    • Children/Schools (249)
    • cicadas (1)
    • Climate (48)
    • Climate Change (111)
    • Clover (1)
    • compost (8)
    • Congress (37)
    • contamination (172)
    • deethylatrazine (1)
    • diamides (1)
    • Disinfectants & Sanitizers (19)
    • Drift (31)
    • Drinking Water (24)
    • Ecosystem Services (43)
    • Emergency Exemption (3)
    • Environmental Justice (190)
    • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (632)
    • Events (93)
    • Farm Bill (31)
    • Farmworkers (229)
    • Forestry (6)
    • Fracking (4)
    • Fungal Resistance (8)
    • Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) (1)
    • Goats (3)
    • Golf (16)
    • Greenhouse (1)
    • Groundwater (23)
    • Health care (33)
    • Herbicides (64)
    • Holidays (48)
    • Household Use (10)
    • Indigenous People (12)
    • Indoor Air Quality (8)
    • Infectious Disease (4)
    • Integrated and Organic Pest Management (80)
    • Invasive Species (36)
    • Label Claims (57)
    • Lawns/Landscapes (260)
    • Litigation (361)
    • Livestock (16)
    • men’s health (9)
    • metabolic syndrome (3)
    • Metabolites (16)
    • Mexico (1)
    • Microbiata (27)
    • Microbiome (44)
    • molluscicide (1)
    • Nanosilver (2)
    • Nanotechnology (54)
    • National Politics (390)
    • Native Americans (8)
    • Occupational Health (29)
    • Oceans (12)
    • Office of Inspector General (5)
    • perennial crops (1)
    • Pesticide Drift (185)
    • Pesticide Efficacy (13)
    • Pesticide Mixtures (32)
    • Pesticide Residues (206)
    • Pets (40)
    • Plant Incorporated Protectants (3)
    • Plastic (14)
    • Poisoning (24)
    • President-elect Transition (3)
    • Reflection (6)
    • Repellent (5)
    • Resistance (128)
    • Rights-of-Way (1)
    • Rodenticide (37)
    • Seasonal (6)
    • Seeds (10)
    • soil health (49)
    • Superfund (5)
    • synergistic effects (46)
    • Synthetic Pyrethroids (20)
    • Synthetic Turf (3)
    • Take Action (648)
    • Textile/Apparel/Fashion Industry (1)
    • Toxic Waste (12)
    • U.S. Supreme Court (7)
    • Volatile Organic Compounds (2)
    • Women’s Health (41)
    • Wood Preservatives (36)
    • World Health Organization (13)
    • Year in Review (3)
  • Most Viewed Posts

Search Results

Growth of GE Crop Acreage Another Reason to Buy Organic

Wednesday, July 11th, 2007

(Beyond Pesticides, July 11, 2007) According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Economic Research Service, the number of genetically engineered (GE) crop acres by U.S. farmers has skyrocketed since their introduction in 1996, despite resistance from consumers and concerns about agricultural and environmental impacts. Because the U.S. does not require GE crops to be labeled, the only way to be sure you are not consuming these products is to buy organic, which forbids the use of GE technologies. Soybeans and cotton genetically engineered with herbicide-tolerant traits have been the most widely and rapidly adopted GE crops in the U.S., followed by insecticide-incorporated cotton and corn. The chart below shows the growth of GE soybeans, cotton and corn since 1996. (HT = modified to be herbicide tolerant, Bt = modified to produce the insecticide Bt) Since 2000, use of HT soybeans has increased from 54% of acreage planted with the crop to 91% in 2007. GE corn varieties, both HT and Bt, have increased from 25% to 73%. Cotton varieties, both HT and Bt, have increased from 61% to 87%. In addition to the lack of information available on the long-term safety of GE products, Beyond Pesticides is concerned with […]

Share

Dicamba Joins Glyphosate on List of GE Crops

Monday, June 11th, 2007

(Beyond Pesticides, June 11, 2007) Scientists from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) have discovered a gene that enables crops to tolerate being sprayed with dicamba. Citing previous experience with glyphosate resistant crops, environmentalists are concerned that this will increase use of a toxic herbicide while negatively impacting health and the environment. This new gene expands the range of genetically engineered (GE) crops available to farmers. The most popular are currently marketed as “Roundup Ready,” or tolerant of glyphosate, by Monsanto Company The discovery is being touted as a way to provide another option in areas where weeds have built up a resistance to glyphosate. Indeed, biochemist Don Weeks, who headed the UNL team, said, “Importantly, we think that this technology will help to extend the lifetime of the Roundup Ready technology. Some Roundup-resistant weeds have emerged in recent years, but working dicamba products into a weed-control strategy with Roundup could help counter that trend and lead to more complete weed control.” In fact, the dicamba-ready technology could appear in fields as part of a “stacked” seed, which is tolerant to both glyphosate and dicamba. Said Mr. Weeks, “It is highly likely that [Monsanto] would stack our gene with the Roundup […]

Share

Following the GE Crop Debate

Tuesday, May 1st, 2007

(Beyond Pesticides, May 1, 2007) More than a month after ordering a temporary halt to sales of genetically engineered (GE) alfalfa seeds, federal district court judge Charles Breyer is considering making the ban permanent, at least until the U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) completes a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that confirms the seeds’ safety. (See Daily News of March 14 for Judge Breyer’s reasoning for siding against Monsanto’s team of lawyers, who were arguing that an EIS is unnecessary.) On why he was reluctant to reauthorize the planting of the GE crop, Breyer said, “It is not the court’s function to do an environmental impact study. That hasn’t been done, and I don’t know if the court ought to do it. The government ought to do it, and that is what I held.” Arguments by industry lawyers emphasized their belief that there is very little likelihood of damage being done by the GE alfalfa. Monsanto, which developed the seeds marketed as “Roundup Ready,” argued that there is an “extremely low risk” of conventional crops being contaminated, providing “appropriate stewardship measures” are taken. Monsanto Lawyer Janice Schneider even said, “There are some significant environmental and beneficial effects in Roundup […]

Share